Search for: "State v. Long." Results 6841 - 6860 of 51,506
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jan 2015, 9:57 am by Maureen Johnston
City of Long Beach 14-151Issue: (1) Whether the Heck v. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 10:35 am by SJM
The fact-finding hearing in The Queen (KN) v LB Barnet [2011] EWHC 2019 (Admin) was heard as long ago as July 2011 but it is worth underlining here as an example of the way the Administrative Court deals with age assessments in the light of the guidance given by the Supreme Court in A v Croydon. [read post]
29 Apr 2019, 9:58 am by Rebecca Jeschke
California has long collected DNA from people convicted of serious felony offenses, but ten years ago the state mandated DNA collection for every single felony arrestee. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Josh Gupta-Kagan, University of South Carolina School of Law, has posted Stanley v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 5:03 am by Timothy P. Flynn
While Lockridge's appeals were pending, an interesting thing happened: the SCOTUS decided Alleyne v United States which held that a judgment of sentence could not be based on a fact that: a) defendant did not admit or, b) was determined to exist beyond a reasonable doubt by a jury.In last week's opinion, the Supreme Court, addressing defendant's Alleyne challenge to his sentence, held that Michigan's mandatory sentencing guidelines were unconstitutional based on… [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 6:08 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
.),  handed down on Friday alters the course of personal jurisdiction law in Pennsylvania relative to corporations.In reviewing the history of the law on this issue, the court noted that, in 2014, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Daimler AG v. [read post]