Search for: "True v. United States"
Results 6841 - 6860
of 9,192
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 3:04 am
The first time, it was a death penalty case. a death penalty case, State v. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 4:59 pm
Bakke (1977); and Citizens United v. [read post]
22 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm
In our system, parentage is a precursor to both rights and obligations.Under the earliest principles, which were borrowed from English law at the time of the United States’s founding, parentage flowed from the marital status of a child’s parents. [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
16 Nov 2009, 4:51 am
(IPEG) United Kingdom EWHC: Registry decision leads to High Court estoppels: William Evans and Susan Mary Evans (trading as Firecraft) v Focal Point Fires plc (Marques) Lord Hoffmann on patentability of software and business methods (IPKat) Making life more comfy for designers? [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 9:14 am
United States Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 12:33 pm
Of course, to the extent this shows the basic structure was sound, that’s true. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 5:57 am
It is wishful thinking, therefore, to argue, as Stewart Jackson (Peterborough) (Con) does, that: Is not it true that the recent case of Greens and M.T. v. the United Kingdom specifically allows the Government to proceed with a range of policy options, which, like the consultation in 2009, could be put out for public discussion? [read post]
8 Mar 2012, 11:00 am
For example, in human rights law, a violation will occur where there has been a failure of state protection.[6] Thus, it makes no sense to speak of a human rights violation and a failure of state protection.[7] And even if a human rights violation is taken to be demonstrative of a failure of state protection (which is true in human rights discourse), the Refugee Convention speaks of a state’s inability or unwillingness to protect an… [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 12:53 pm
” Goodwin v. [read post]
11 Sep 2012, 12:25 pm
We believe the same reasoning holds true for negligence per se claims. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 4:03 pm
Its attorneys—hired by TSI on a state-by-state basis--never do that. [read post]
6 May 2022, 5:50 pm
Second true story: March-April, 2020. [read post]
8 Mar 2007, 6:22 am
V. [read post]
4 Feb 2025, 1:29 pm
” The executive order also states that the Biden administration’s application of Bostock v. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 6:58 am
United States District Court, 549 F.2d 686, 695 (9th Cir. 1977). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 2:33 pm
Glover, they do not correctly state “the law as it stands in the United States”. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 6:30 am
That may well be true—if the ‘reasonable disagreement’ test is indeed applied correctly—but all that can be discovered through this approach is some sort of conceptual core of the phenomenon under study. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 7:25 am
Sponsored Topics: United States - Government - Sonia Sotomayor - Politics - United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary [read post]
