Search for: "Works v. State" Results 6841 - 6860 of 60,497
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Mar 2015, 11:37 am
I appreciate Judge Nguyen's concise explanation of how federal extradition works. [read post]
7 Mar 2008, 4:55 am
It was held that the existence of a working sprinkler system was on any view material to the proposal and the absence of such a system was by the same token a material change in the facts stated in that proposal. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:03 am by jgabryno
Plain English Issue: Does the government violate a federal contract employee’s constitutional right to privacy by asking her whether she has received counseling or treatment for recent illegal drug use in the past year, or by asking her references if they have any reason to believe she is unsuited to work in a federal facility? [read post]
The disputed rates in Newbigin (Valuation Officer) (Respondent) v S J & J Monk (a firm) (Appellant) relate to building works in 2012 and the question was whether the rating list could give the building a £1 nominal value or whether it had to assume a market value based in an assumption of repair. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 4:18 am by Russ Bensing
™  In State v. [read post]
12 Feb 2013, 3:30 am by Kenneth Kan
To read previous posts on what constitutes a total loss, click here. 1Williams v. [read post]
15 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
"Citing two decisions by the Supreme Court, Delaware State College v Ricks, 449 U.S. 25 and Chardon v Fernandez, 454 U.S. 6, the Second Circuit held that plaintiff's notice of termination in this case may, itself, constitute an adverse employment action notwithstanding its revocation before it became effective for the purpose of litigating an alleged unlawful discrimination or other claim.Although in this action the court found that the rescission of a notice of… [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 2:21 pm by Native American Rights Fund
Courts of Appeals Bulletin - find case summaries and links to source documents at:http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/cta/2014cta.htmlUnited States v. [read post]