Search for: "Bodie v Bodie" Results 6861 - 6880 of 21,351
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Aug 2009, 10:00 pm
"As a result of said occurrence, the plaintiff sustained severe injuries to his body, which resulted in physical pain, mental anguish, and other medical problems," the original petition states.Knowles subsequently became unemployed. [read post]
16 Mar 2015, 10:03 pm by Patricia Salkin
Smith v Stephens Media Group-Watertown, LLC, 2015 WL 496796 (NYAD 4 Dept. 2/6/2015) The opinion can be accessed at: http://leagle.com/decision/In%20NYCO%2020140131493/SMITH%20v.%20STEPHENS%20MEDIA%20GROUP Filed under: Current Caselaw - New York, Procedural Issues [read post]
7 Feb 2012, 2:40 am by Milen Hristov
In its decision on the case Johannes Gerrit Cornelis van Schaik v Hoge Raad der Nederlanden  in Para  21 the Court has ruled that: ...Article 4 of the directive further provides that the roadworthiness tests, within the meaning of the directive, are to be carried out by the State or by bodies or establishments designated and directly supervised by the State. [read post]
25 Jul 2008, 4:11 pm
A rare exception to this rule was recently addressed by the Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania on July 22, 2008, when the Allegheny Power Service Corp. v. [read post]
19 Aug 2010, 3:45 am by Brent Lorentz
 Up until a recent 7th Circuit decision in Jay Franco & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Jan 2008, 4:55 pm
Some compensation is warranted and will go a long ways towards ending the club v. country battles that now take place. [read post]
14 Sep 2014, 10:17 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
 At that time I asked the judge to enter a finding of not guilty citing to United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2021, 8:41 am by Tom Smith
  Proponents of the Equality Act say it simply extends the logic of the Supreme Court's decision in Bostock v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 11:47 am by John J. Donohue III, Jane S. Schacter
A Constitutional Earthquake: Stanford’s Jane Schacter on SCOTUS Decision to Overturn Roe v. [read post]