Search for: "Kennedy v. State"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 8,225
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jun 2009, 9:17 am
Sounding Co. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 9:15 am
Justice Kennedy filed a dissenting opinion, in which Chief Justice Roberts and Justices Breyer and Alito joined. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 4:36 am
Today, SCOTUS handed down the much-anticipated opinion in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:40 am
On Monday, the United States Supreme Court decided the case of Forest Grove Sch Dist v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 3:21 am
Kennedy dissented in an opinion joined by Roberts, Breyer, and Alito. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 2:00 am
OR STATE GOVERNMENT WORKS [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:11 pm
Tags: Affirmative Action, Northwest Austin v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 9:26 am
Supreme Court case of Coeur Alaska, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 6:35 am
In Gross v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:08 pm
Writing for the majority, Justice Stevens, joined by the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, and Alito, relied heavily on the Court's previous decisions in School Committee of Burlington v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 3:04 pm
United States or United States v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 2:08 pm
But the Act imposes current burdens and must be justified by current needs.Besides Section 5 discriminates among the states.The Act also differentiates between the States, despite our historic tradition that all the States enjoy "equal sovereignty. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 1:10 pm
Today, one such decision was handed down from on high -- the case known as Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 10:43 am
There was a campaign finance case a couple of years ago [called Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:50 am
No more blatant example of this distinction exists than the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Caperton v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 9:09 am
I suggested that the canon should not only include super-precedents like Brown v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 7:53 am
Forest Grove v. [read post]
22 Jun 2009, 6:30 am
The Tonnage Clause was thus intended to prevent States from obtaining certain "geographical vessel-related tax advantages. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 12:01 am
Since Kelo v. [read post]
20 Jun 2009, 4:22 pm
See Kennedy v. [read post]
