Search for: "People v. Short"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 8,147
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Aug 2024, 9:01 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in United States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
Wyeth, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 3:30 am
Long-term easy is short-term hard. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 11:15 am
Indeed, the colloquial "water torture" references in U.S. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 8:00 am
O’Keefe v Caldwell (1949) Argus Law Reports 381. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 3:20 am
The press release also says that hearings will be displayed with ‘a short descriptor of what the case is about, allowing the media and members of the public to make an informed decision on whether to attend the hearing. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 7:47 am
And, intelligent people cuss more. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 10:39 am
The outfield is kept short. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 9:01 pm
It simply had none.It is quite different when a court decides not to tell people what its reasoning is, in the name of not issuing dicta. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm
In Trump v. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 2:34 pm
ELENA KAGAN: Senator Feinstein, I do think that the continuing holding of Roe and Doe v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 1:44 am
Supreme Court's decision in Republican Party of Minnesota v. [read post]
30 Jun 2016, 6:00 am
But when he read the Ontario lawyer’s demand letter he was overcome with a feeling that the letter was nothing short of “extortion by letterhead”. [4] Yet something else was contributing to his feelings of contempt. [read post]
21 May 2023, 9:00 pm
If the prediction turns out to be true that June 1 is the drop-dead date, then June 2 would simply be the first day on which people could file suit to stop the President from doing what had previously been merely hypothetical. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 4:47 am
New York has successfully been doing this for almost 200 years for verdicts that are unreasonable, since Chief Judge James Kent wrote the following in Coleman v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 8:31 am
The overwhelming result of all trials ends in a verdict of guilt for the accused and at that point another state official (bailiff, prison warden, parole officer, etc.) is obligated to apply the decision.[9] However, Dubber clarifies that the reference to the State in the style of cause is not thought to be a requirement for the publicness of a dispute.[10] He cites German cases that refer simply to the ‘Criminal Case against X’; a reference to ‘the… [read post]
6 May 2010, 4:12 pm
Pa. 2008); Colon v. [read post]
26 Feb 2008, 1:52 pm
In this case, the trial judge had to bear in mind that he had already increased the damages for wrongful dismissal in accordance with Wallace v. [read post]
1 Feb 2024, 6:05 am
” In the 2012 touchstone decision Arizona v. [read post]
6 Dec 2023, 6:05 am
District Court (Eastern District of Michigan) in the King v. [read post]
