Search for: "People v. Tooks" Results 6861 - 6880 of 12,219
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2014, 7:44 am by Ronald Collins
Question:  In what may well be an unprecedented event in Supreme Court history, in his McCutcheon v. [read post]
9 Aug 2014, 4:16 am by SHG
For a similar case, see United States v. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:11 am by Eric Penzer
  A court should not employ a presumption where to do so would “elevate a legal construct above common sense” (People v Giordano, 87 NY2d 441 [1995]). [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 5:02 am
They were telling them how much money was there, how many people -- or how many victims might be there. [read post]
6 Aug 2014, 7:19 pm by Donald Thompson
 In People v Schreier, 22 NY3d 494 [2014], the Court made clear that surreptitiousness is a separate and distinct element from whether the recording was done without the subject’s knowledge or consent, and is also separate and distinct from the requirement that the recording took place in a location where the subject had a reasonable expectation of privacy (both of which are also required by the statute). [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 3:48 pm by Brendan Kevenides
 (Emphasis is mine).Personal injury cases in Illinois are generally decided by 12 regular people. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 10:23 pm by Florian Mueller
Those amicus curiae briefs always come with a disclaimer that no party took part in drafting the brief or supported it financially. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 5:53 am
Tate supra.The Supreme Court then took up the first issue, i.e., Tate’s comparing cell phone tracking technology to the GPS tracking devicewe examined in State v. [read post]