Search for: "Peter v. Peter" Results 6861 - 6880 of 8,633
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by Barry Eagar
 Rather, it must be an effect of such substance or quality that the method considered as a whole is proper subject matter for a patent.Cross references in Bazpat: http://bazpat.blogspot.com/search/label/Subject%20MatterSignificant cases cited:  Grant v Commissioner of Patents [2006] FCAFCWelcome Real-Time SA v Catuity Inc [2001] FCA 445National Research Development Corporation v Commissioner of Patents [1959] HCA 67 (The NRDC case)Commissioner of… [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 3:53 am by SHG
But in the matter of the state of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Aug 2010, 9:40 pm by CAPTAIN
Tomorrow, Group 62: Gordo v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 9:55 pm
It's packed with news and analysis of recent big cases -- including the Dyson v Vax dispute mentioned above and Schlumberger v EMGS, noted by the IPKat here. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 12:40 pm by Meg Martin
Peters of Peters Associates, LLC, Teton Village, Wyoming.Representing Kimmel: Peter F. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:34 am by Joe Mullin
Columbia Law School professor Eben Moglen heads the Software Freedom Law Center (SFLC) and wrote the group's amicus brief in Kappos v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:03 pm
See generally, Peter B. [read post]