Search for: "State v. First Judicial District Court"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 9,091
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Mar 2011, 8:41 am
However, since there remains a distinct split of federal authority on this issue and since the United States Supreme Court recently declined to determine the issue in Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. [read post]
20 May 2009, 7:36 am
" However, the panel reversed the district court's holding on standing, noting that the district court had misconstrued Second Circuit precedent. [read post]
18 Jan 2018, 2:13 pm
Mattis habeas litigation in federal district court in D.C. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 11:35 am
There is also a model for a local coordinating body in the 26th Judicial District. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 8:46 am
” When the Supreme Court hears arguments in Elgin v. [read post]
14 Dec 2023, 3:21 pm
Also consider that on Monday, December 11, 2023, in State v. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 11:20 am
The district court agreed. [read post]
22 Aug 2011, 9:53 am
It also is the ultimate ground of the Court’s holding in McCulloch v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 12:37 pm
” The Court endorsed this view seven years later in Strauder v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 11:35 am
Badger, where the Fifth District Court of Appeal of the State of Florida invalidated a trust decanting. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 10:05 am
District Court in Shelton is binding. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 9:15 am
Stay motion Judge Spath moves on to the defense’s “motion to abate pending the resolution of the United States v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
” Jane Doe I v. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 4:02 pm
The first problem is that those cases coming before the courts have not yet required judicial interpretation of many of the new issues of fact and law arising from internet publication. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 6:44 am
Certiorari-Stage Documents:Opinion below (Court of Appeals of Missouri, Western District)Petition for certiorariBrief in opposition Title: Herrera v. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
To date, the UCCJEA has been adopted by 49 states and the District of Columbia (except for Massachusetts) and various U.S. territories. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 10:21 am
But to accept the limitations of the judiciary, whether one is a liberal or a conservative, requires accepting the possibility that the Constitution itself needs significant non-judicially-imposed amendment, which only promotes feelings of despair and hopelessness given the true awfulness of Article V. [read post]
26 Jun 2012, 1:02 pm
Medical marijuana would be available to patients in 17 states, plus the District of Columbia, free from harassment by federal officials. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 7:08 am
* * * *The Supreme Court explained, in the second of its ACA cases (King v. [read post]
4 Mar 2013, 7:32 am
First, it wasn’t about state law claims and indeed remanded the UCL/FAL claims to the district court. [read post]
