Search for: "State v. Holder"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 7,213
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2010, 10:49 am
Moreover, in light of the incredibly more stringent obviousness standard set forth in KSR v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 6:29 pm
" Compare Judge Rich's characterization of PHOSITA in Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
27 May 2010, 4:02 pm
The text of the Memo in its entirety below:May 19, 2010MEMORANDUM TO ALL FEDERAL PROSECUTORSFrom: Eric H Holder, Jr. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 4:48 am
Arguably inconsistent with this analysis, however, they state that BNVs "will not affect the outcome" of the vote. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 5:09 pm
Harris v Harris (1962) 57 C2d 367. 3. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 7:53 pm
In the US, it was found in the 1990s that a prohibition on automatic telephone direct marketing that applied to political campaigning was constitutional: the case is Van Bergen v Minnesota 59 F.3d 1541 (8th Circuit CA). [read post]
4 Jun 2011, 5:29 am
"United States v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:05 pm
Changes in the costs of transition or in the mix of shareholders in the firm’s register (green v. non-green) may lead the firm to renege on transition “pledges” when the time comes to incur significant costs. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 2:23 pm
At the same time, the national debt has soared (it is currently $14.3 trillion, of which $9.7 trillion is “public debt”—that is, debt owed bondholders rather than social security annuitants and other entitlement holders), and unemployment exceeds 9 percent, with about half the unemployed not having worked for at least six months. [read post]
3 Sep 2012, 3:56 am
Typically the person seeking to post the comment is the holder of a Google+ account, for whom no personal details are provided. [read post]
15 Oct 2007, 8:11 am
(Even Judge Posner described this process of trying to get through to an 800 number as a "vexing and protracted undertaking" in Miller v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:53 pm
Whether one is happy with the state of intellectual property law or not, it seems to have worked as advertised in this case. [read post]
10 Oct 2014, 3:09 am
But when they speak of gravity knives today, it’s a very different animal, as revealed in Bronx Supreme Court Justice Troy Webber’s opinion in People v. [read post]
21 Jan 2013, 3:46 pm
The authors point out that Justice Souter suggested just such a possibility in a footnote to the Supreme Court’s decision in Campbell v. [read post]
20 Dec 2016, 10:52 am
Though nothing prevents these signs, through their usage, from becoming trademarks, the federal government should not support such discriminatory behavior by conferring benefits to the mark-holders through federal registration. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 3:56 pm
Assoc. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 2:33 pm
Second, irrespective of whether the target performs classified work, the parties must consider the role of the Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States (“CFIUS”). [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:03 pm
S’holder Litig., 177 A.3d 1208 (Del. 2017). [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 3:34 am
In Willis Re, Inc. v. [read post]
