Search for: "U.S. v. Earl*" Results 6861 - 6880 of 22,462
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2010, 9:10 am by Charles Kotuby
The dissent gives little deference to foreign court decisions defining the Convention, and would not allow a peculiar foreign law—like the one at issue here—to blur the categorical line between access and custody rights, expand the scope of the Convention’s return remedy, and thus effectively mandate the abdication of U.S. jurisdiction over the matter. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:42 am by Rohini Kurup
On April 27, the Supreme Court agreed to take up United States v. [read post]
12 Aug 2008, 8:57 pm
Love 522 U.S. 67 and U.S. v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 2:20 pm by Eugene Kontorovich
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 12:01 am
A well-defined and adequately enforced law that allows a "V" logo to be put only on truly vegan products would be a good start, and it would hardly be intrusive or burdensome. [read post]