Search for: "US v. Weekes"
Results 6861 - 6880
of 39,089
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Apr 2021, 1:21 pm
Shield N Seal (Posted April 3, 2021) Covid Case of the Week - Kofler v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 10:12 pm
To celebrate the occasion, I’ll be posting some thoughts, links to Flynn V. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 3:30 am
In a big decision last week that has immediate implications for companies facing derivative claims in the 9th Circuit and may eventually head to the US Supreme Court, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Lee v. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 3:45 am
The big one, of course, was US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2012, 1:01 pm
Each week, we feature some of the most interesting news related to technology and civil liberties that we’ve spotted from the previous week. [read post]
2 May 2018, 7:01 am
Meanwhile, the DC Circuit held oral argument last week in Doe v. [read post]
21 Nov 2010, 4:38 pm
Events No events have been reported to us. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
21 Aug 2017, 3:33 am
Until last week’s decision by the Brooklyn-based Appellate Division, Second Department — the same court that gave us 1545 Ocean Avenue — in Mace v Tunick, 2017 NY Slip Op 06170 [2d Dept Aug. 16, 2017], I would have answered that question “no” with support from a number of case precedents in New York and other jurisdictions including that hotbed of contractarian jurisprudence known as Delaware. [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 6:37 am
While the Court continues a busy week, most coverage focuses on yesterday’s opinion in Michigan v. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 8:34 am
” “More specifically, the CCPA gives California residents the right to (i) know what personal information is being collected, used, shared, or sold about them, (ii) know whether and to whom their personal information is sold or otherwise disclosed, (iii) access and review their personal information, (iv) opt-out of the sale of their personal information, and (v) non-discrimination in the level of service and pricing despite exercising any of their privacy rights. [read post]
3 Dec 2018, 3:56 am
It’s Gamble v. [read post]
13 Sep 2015, 4:00 am
This week’s summaries concern: Administrative Law – Civil Rights – Elections – Bankruptcy – Indians, Inuit and Métis Trinity Western University et al. v. [read post]
1 Jul 2018, 4:08 pm
We noted last week that there has been a 40% increase in issued defamation cases in 2017. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 4:07 pm
(United States v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 2:01 pm
The district court conducted a 16-week trial involving claims against both DuPont and the government. [read post]
16 Jun 2013, 7:47 am
United States v. [read post]
27 Jan 2019, 10:37 am
United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2018, 4:11 am
In the first case, Frank v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 3:47 am
Back in 1996 in Whren v. [read post]
