Search for: "Unit, Inc., Appeal of" Results 6861 - 6880 of 13,896
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Oct 2015, 12:02 pm by Larry
In Composite Technology International, Inc v. [read post]
21 Sep 2020, 12:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
Finally, Diamond tried to get the court to adopt the rule of Novartis Consumer Health, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Assn., Inc., Long Beach Unit, 8 NY3d 465, explained that "[p]ublic policy in New York favors arbitral resolution of public sector labor disputes. [read post]
15 Mar 2016, 7:58 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The Court of Appeals says the jury may find otherwise.The case is Grenawalt v. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 7:00 am by Kevin Miles
IANCU, DIRECTOR, UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE, ET AL. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 5:00 am by Jon Robinson
Halliburton, 667 F.3d 602 (5th Cir. 2012): In a very well reasoned Defense Base Act (“DBA”) decision, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit determined that the DBA is an employee’s exclusive remedy for injuries sustained during employment. [read post]
1 Feb 2015, 9:57 am by Christopher Simon
Innovative Contracting Solutions, Inc., a recent decision from the Atlanta Division of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. [read post]
2 Nov 2014, 11:14 am by Richard Booth
Securities fraud is back in the Supreme Court in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 7:55 am by Richard Booth
When the curtain rose for oral argument in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:55 pm by war
Sports Warehouse successfully opposed Fry registering: However, Dodds-Streeton J has now upheld Fry’s appeal. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 3:31 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Board Member Concerning the Company’s Acquisition PREET BHARARA, the United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, and JANICE K. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 10:16 pm
But in recent United States cases, the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals and lower courts have upheld field-of-use licenses prohibiting activities that licensees would otherwise have been permitted by patent law, such as the repair and resale of patented products. [read post]