Search for: "United States v. Grant" Results 6861 - 6880 of 25,384
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
  The defendant obtained the products bearing the copyright from a third party who legally purchased them outside the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 9:04 am by Steven Cohen
United States District Court – Northern District of Oklahoma – April 4th, 2019) involves an alleged failure to pay overtime wages. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
  In comparing the two readings what differences in approaches can one discern between that of equity as practiced outside the United States (in Australia) and in the United States.2. [read post]
7 Oct 2022, 1:53 pm by Kalvis Golde
The justices granted the states’ petition in Arizona v. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
Ricci v DeStefano, United State Supreme Court, Docket Nos. 07-1428 and 08-328New York State's Constitution mandates that "appointments and promotions in the civil service of the state and all of the civil divisions thereof, including cities and villages, shall be made according to merit and fitness to be ascertained, as far as practicable, by examination which, as far as practicable, shall be competitive" [Article V, Section 6].*… [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 10:15 am by Michael Lowe
  One good bit of news in all that mess is the ruling of the United States Supreme Court in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 4:47 pm by Steven G. Pearl
The Court (Los Angeles Superior, Judge White) granted the motion: First, the court concluded that the holding of Fitz-Gerald v. [read post]
16 May 2019, 8:00 am by Robert Kreisman
However, the trial judge concluded that the internal-affairs doctrine required application of the United Kingdom’s “reflective loss” rule granted the defendants’’ motion to dismiss based on the investors’ lack of standing. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm by Law Lady
 Billing Fraud: VIRGINIA FEDERAL JUDGE WON'T DISMISS MEDICARE FRAUD DEFENDANTS, United States v. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 5:00 am by Kimberly A. Kralowec
Supreme Court Order (01/11/12): In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:07 am by Susan Brenner
 The district court judge who had the case granted the motion because he found that Abbott v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 12:26 pm by Robert C. Weill
 Question certified: Does the limitation in section 766.31(1)(b)1., Florida Statutes, of a single award of $100,000 to both parents violate the Equal Protection Clause of the United States and Florida Constitutions? [read post]
5 Jul 2022, 9:06 pm by Dan Flynn
That question is being disputed during the pre-trial stage of the United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 2:16 pm by Gregory Forman
  Hearn’s opinion discusses United States Supreme Court jurisprudence at the time South Carolina adopted article I, section 10, noting that Griswold v. [read post]
23 Jul 2024, 2:51 pm by Christopher J. Walker
From the website of the Administrative Conference of the United States: The Administrative Conference of the United States (ACUS) is pleased to announce a public forum, Recent Administrative Law Developments in the Supreme Court: What’s Next for Agencies? [read post]