Search for: "COOPER V. COOPER" Results 6881 - 6900 of 11,625
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While the Court recognized that a refusal to cooperate alone does not justify a detention or seizure, it noted that "unprovoked flight is simply not a mere refusal to cooperate"; rather, it is the antithesis of "going about one's business". [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 5:01 pm by Stephen Bilkis
While the Court recognized that a refusal to cooperate alone does not justify a detention or seizure, it noted that "unprovoked flight is simply not a mere refusal to cooperate"; rather, it is the antithesis of "going about one's business". [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 11:38 am by mpeters
       According to the complaint in Kickflip Inc. v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 10:55 am by Sarah Tran
The hot news misappropriation doctrine, born in International News Service v. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 8:19 am by Julie Brook, Esq.
People v Urziceanu (2005) 132 CA4th 747, 773, 33 CR3d 859. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 4:08 am by Susan Brenner
Pelletier and Cherry signed the statement at the bottom, and Pelletier remained friendly, cooperative, and interested in the job. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 12:56 pm by Mark Ashton
 But the Court still found the relationship positive and the parties hereto fore, cooperative. [read post]
27 Nov 2012, 2:25 am
The Slater v Condappa case - see above. [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 1:30 am by 1 Crown Office Row
  Yes, Strasbourg endorsed that finding five years later in A v UK (2009) but it is the Belmarsh judgment that led to the withdrawal of Part IV, and which still stands as a precedent binding on lower courts. [read post]
24 Nov 2012, 7:14 am by Allard Knook
The Court however reiterated that a Member State which had granted or sought to be allowed to grant aid under one of the exceptions provided for in the Treaty rules had a duty to cooperate with the Commission in the proceeding in which it took part, pursuant to which it must in particular provided all the information necessary to enable the Commission to verify that the conditions for the derogation sought were fulfilled (Case C‑364/90 Italy v Commission [1993]; Joined Cases… [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
McCann, Wayne State Univ: Between Thugs and Innocents: Racialized Violence and the Perogative of ‘Self Defense’ in the Trayvon Martin Case Robert Mills, Northwestern University: The Harmonious Vocalics of Judicial Unanimity: Authorship and Legitimacy in Cooper v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:22 pm by Paul Karlsgodt
  The second issue is one that may be clarified when the Supreme Court rules later this term on Comcast v. [read post]