Search for: "Doe v. State"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 93,990
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Dec 2010, 4:15 am
A court's review of a disciplinary arbitration award is limited and does not encompass consideration of the merits of the award or the penalty imposedMatter of State of New York v Civil Serv. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
The primary issue in Michael P. involved whether the State of Hawaii – which has the only statewide school district – mandated use of the “severe discrepancy model” in derogation of the controlling federal law, or whether Hawaii DOE had discretion as a “local education agency” to use the model. [read post]
24 Oct 2013, 3:29 pm
It does. [read post]
28 Aug 2016, 1:11 pm
Facts of the Case In the case of Marshall v. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 6:35 am
That seems like a way to shoehorn an argument into a context that does not cleanly fit, and the plaintiff does not take that route here. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 3:00 pm
Stanford student Tiffany Cartwright previews tomorrow’s argument in Forest Grove School District v. [read post]
19 Aug 2007, 7:46 am
State v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 1:53 pm
The court in R. v. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 8:38 pm
” United States v. [read post]
19 Jun 2019, 12:35 pm
Hollowell A recent United States Supreme Court decision handed down in May addressed what occurred when contract, bankruptcy, and intellectual property laws intersected.[1] In Mission Products Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2024, 10:13 am
The court explains: California law does not categorically state that a contract can never be formed on the basis of browsewrap. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:26 am
In City of Garden Grove v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
8 Jan 2018, 8:00 am
Pa. 1997); United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2023, 7:30 am
Pereira v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 9:08 am
Bank v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Estate of Paterno v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 8:00 am
Estate of Paterno v. [read post]
4 Sep 2024, 10:04 am
From Doe v. [read post]
13 Oct 2011, 11:57 am
On remand, it will be interesting to see what the state court does, given what many observers see as their recent resistant approach on directions from the high Court on remands. [read post]
