Search for: "People v J."
Results 6881 - 6900
of 7,247
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Oct 2012, 10:39 am
Justice Jackson wrote in his dissent in Beauharnais v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 6:58 am
(Attia et al v. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 1:31 am
The evils of health care fraud are many – it undermines the judgment of health care professionals, deprives people of the treatment that they need, and, in many cases, can put patients’ health and safety at risk. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 9:01 pm
First, the Supreme Court held in Oncale v. [read post]
29 May 2021, 5:25 pm
” Ganung v. [read post]
15 Nov 2019, 11:21 am
Among its provisions are the following defined federal crimes: Obtaining National Security Information, 18 USC § 1030(a)(1) Accessing a Computer and Obtaining Information, 18 USC § 1030(a)(2) Trespassing in a Government Computer, 18 USC § 1030(a)(3) Accessing to Defraud and Obtain Value, 18 USC § 1030(a)(4) Damaging a Computer or Information, 18 USC § 1030(a)(5) Trafficking in Passwords, 18 USC § 1030(a)(6) Threatening to Damage a Computer, 18 USC §… [read post]
17 Jul 2015, 7:39 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2010, 4:21 am
It includes the intrinsic worth of human beings shared by all people as well as the individual reputation of each person built upon his or her own individual achievements” (Khumalo v Holomisa [2002] ZACC 12 [27] ) There is social value in ensuring that false statements which adversely impact on a person’s reputation are corrected. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 8:23 pm
The authors criticise the recent ECJ judgment in Wood Floor Solutions Andreas Domberger GmbH v. [read post]
4 Aug 2014, 9:01 pm
In one notable example, Miller v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question canvassed by Laws LJ (who gave the only reasoned judgment, with which Cranston J agreed) was which category of discrimination it fell into. [read post]
30 Jun 2008, 12:18 am
See Ferguson v. [read post]
30 Jul 2013, 10:53 am
The question canvassed by Laws LJ (who gave the only reasoned judgment, with which Cranston J agreed) was which category of discrimination it fell into. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 9:01 pm
Bush’s signature initiatives, and his version of the gag rule specifically exempted HIV/AIDS funding because it was understood organizations providing prevention, care, or treatment to people with HIV/AIDS could not adequately function under the gag rule’s restrictions. [read post]
22 May 2017, 9:01 pm
The Louisiana Supreme Court continued this trend with its recent decision in Acurio v. [read post]
20 Feb 2015, 12:30 pm
The argument relies on Offutt v. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:50 am
In the Paperlink case, Costello J. held that the nature of the Constitution as “a political instrument as well as a legal document” means that a “purposive” rather than a literal approach is appropriate to its interpretation. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 9:56 pm
Magistrates in the Tang Dynasty in early China were also eager to avoid the formal legal system and so encouraged parties to resolve disputes amicably between themselves.[9] In contrast, the United States’ patent law can be seen in the case of Twentieth Century Music Corp. v. [read post]
18 Sep 2011, 11:26 am
First, under the plurality test enunciated in O’Connor v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The “whitewashed” antiquities would then re-enter the market of Mainland China or circulate in foreign markets.[17] China’s Legal Framework for Cultural Property Protection, Auction, and Restitution The cornerstone of China’s cultural property law is the 1982 Law of the People’s Republic of China on the Protection of Cultural Relics (“1982 LPCR”). [read post]
