Search for: "Sales v. State"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 21,156
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2020, 1:55 pm
V. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 2:44 am
Green Building Council (“USGBC”) and its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (“LEED”) program recently scored a victory in the case of Gifford et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
In another similar case, DJO, LLC v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:11 am
In its June 2010 decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 6:36 am
Figueroa v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 10:14 am
Brantley v. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:30 am
In 1952, the court held in Steele v. [read post]
8 Apr 2013, 2:00 am
Hatfield v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
In 2008, 1-800 Contacts estimated that competitive keyword bidding was causing it to lose over $68k/month in sales. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 9:39 am
(citing DePuy Synthes Sales, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jul 2021, 10:09 am
Rojas v. [read post]
28 Apr 2020, 4:20 am
By a vote of 6-3, the court dismissed as moot a Second Amendment challenge to New York City’s now-repealed limits on transporting personal firearms, in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2015, 3:58 am
It stated however that there was no point in allowing the appeal and remitting it to the county court. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:14 am
The Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 10:14 am
The Court’s decision in Integrity Staffing Solutions v. [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 12:30 pm
In the case of Sullivan v. [read post]
8 Mar 2011, 2:05 pm
(“Amsted”) filed a complaint alleging a violation of Section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain cast steel railways and certain products containing same by reason of misappropriation of its trade secrets (the “ABC Trade Secrets”). [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 4:47 am
The result here is consistent with the Sixth Circuit's rulings in cases like United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2019, 8:40 am
Feb. 9, 2018): “to the extent Plaintiffs’ state law claims are premised on Defendants’ alleged manufacturing and sale of Infringing Merchandise, and not merely passive publication of designs created by third parties, the CDA does not preempt the state law claims. [read post]
24 Feb 2017, 1:57 pm
Consider, for example, a state statute permitting a sale of assets free and clear of liens, but only if the sale is through a bankruptcy proceeding. [read post]
