Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 6881 - 6900
of 25,502
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Oct 2018, 3:49 am
In a Court of Appeal decision published recently, Icescape v Ice-World ([2018] EWCA Civ 2219), Lord Kitchin, who has been recently elevated to the Supreme Court, applies the principles of Actavis. [read post]
24 Oct 2018, 3:00 am
Cooley v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 12:46 pm
Bellamy v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 11:14 am
” Although finding that this standard had been met, Bolanos determined that the putative damages in this matter violated the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment as observed by the US Supreme Court in State Farm v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 7:12 am
His state-law disability discrimination claim also failed (Sienkiewicz v. [read post]
United Airlines pilots granted Rule 23 certification in USERRA suit; no subclasses for separate CBAs
23 Oct 2018, 7:01 am
As for the dispute over class definitions, the court largely sided with the plaintiff, finding it unnecessary to create subclasses that reflected periods during which pilots of the merged airlines were working under different collective bargaining agreements (Moss v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 5:00 am
In the case of Balentine v. [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 4:41 am
” “Where an attorney’s motion to dismiss is premised on the argument that the client could not have succeeded on its underlying claim, the attorney must show that the plaintiff would have been unable to prove one of the essential elements of the claim (Burbige v Siben & Ferber, 152 AD3d 641, 642 [2d Dept 2017]; Velie v Ellis Law, P.C., 48 AD3d 674, 675 [2d Dept 2008]). [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 3:45 am
” In an op-ed for The Hill, Mark Miller urges the justices to review Marquette County Road Commission v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:57 pm
The case is entitled Yu v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context: “It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 10:00 am
But as the Fifth Circuit held in Brand Services LLC v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 3:17 am
” Salm v. [read post]
21 Oct 2018, 10:29 am
McGill v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 9:36 pm
The Supreme Court explained this enforcement rationale in its POM Wonderful LLC v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 4:36 pm
” To “defraud the United States” has a specific meaning under U.S. case law: According to Hammerschmidt v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 12:55 pm
Without independence, there is no Brown v. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 10:47 am
In Caparo v Dickman Lord Bridge cautioned against discussing duties of care in abstract terms divorced from factual context:"It is never sufficient to ask simply whether A owes B a duty of care. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:10 am
NSD734/2018) by Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd against the decision of a single judge of the Federal Court of Australia in Encompass Corporation Pty Ltd v InfoTrack Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 421. [read post]
19 Oct 2018, 7:10 am
[ In Taglieri v. [read post]
