Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 6881 - 6900 of 41,773
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2010, 3:45 am
The Court of Appeals addressed the impact of Section 13-173.1 in Waldeck v NYC Employees' Retirement System, 81 N.Y.2d 804, decided with Barbaro v NYC Employees' Retirement System. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 8:30 am by Guest Author
”[4] Former Clinton Administration OIRA head Sally Katzen states that  “[t]he virtues of analysis—as robust as needed, commensurate with the significance of the decision being made—are, to me, self-evident: the regulator must think through, with all available data and in a systematic and disciplined way, all the intended and unintended consequences of a proposed rule. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 4:27 pm by John Jascob
In its opinion (covered in the Securities Regulation Daily Wrap Up for October 2, 2014), the panel stated that the plaintiffs failed adequately to allege facts giving rise to a strong inference of scienter. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 3:29 am
A school board waiver of its right to dismiss a probationary school administrator at any time during the probationary term must be explicitly statedConsedine v Portville Cent. [read post]
The bench, comprising of Justices B V Nagarathna and Ujjal Bhuyan, did not find any merit in the applications. [read post]
31 Mar 2016, 4:00 am by Emma Cross, Olswang LLP
CPR 3.1(7) states that “A power of the court under these Rules to make an order includes a power to vary or revoke the order”. [read post]