Search for: "True v True" Results 6881 - 6900 of 33,955
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 4:46 pm by INFORRM
At least as interpreted by the European Data Protection Board (see WP 260 (2018) which was endorsed by the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) at its first plenary), this is true of essentially all of the proactive transparency notice rules applicable to the direct collection of personal data (GDPR, art. 13) and most of the other proactive transparency notice rules too (Ibid, art. 14). [read post]
4 May 2020, 9:00 am by Paula Lombardi
[2]Lévis (City) v Tétreault; Lévis (City) v 2629-4470 Québec inc. [read post]
4 May 2020, 8:07 am by Aida Geragusian
The ECJ has ruled on the definition of worker status under the EU Working Time Directive in the case of B v Yodel Delivery Network Ltd – is this good news for businesses? [read post]
4 May 2020, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
 John Marshall ended his first paragraph in McCulloch v. [read post]
2 May 2020, 7:49 am by Eric Goldman
Even if true, the court says this doesn’t affect whether the plaintiff’s representations to Amazon were correct. [read post]
1 May 2020, 11:29 am by Buckingham
The case is Defender Security Company, dba Defender Direct v. [read post]