Search for: "United States v. Peoples" Results 6881 - 6900 of 22,870
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2011, 10:00 pm by Keith Rizzardi
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service (“Service”) listed the delta smelt as a threatened species in 1993 under the Endangered Species Act... [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 1:58 pm by Peter Margulies
§ 1182(f), authorizing the president to bar entry of foreign nationals “detrimental to the interests of the United States”—the same provision that Trump used for his travel ban, which the Supreme Court upheld in Trump v. [read post]
25 Jan 2011, 3:06 pm by stu@crimapp.com
In Citizens United v Federal Election Commission, 103 SCt 876 (2010),the United States Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign spending by outside organizations. [read post]
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Courts in New York State have consistently recognized the importance of using progressive discipline.Rulings by the New York State Supreme Court, the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court, and the Court of Appeals, New York State’s highest court, suggest an employer’s in assigning severe penalties for certain “first offenses” may not survive judicial review. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The Courts of many jurisdictions have been grappling with the issue of how to regulate illegality on the internet in circumstances where most of the major corporations are based in the United States where they have immunity from liability under under section 230 of the Communications Decency Act of 1996. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 3:43 am by Fiona de Londras
This morning the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights handed down its long-awaited judgment in Al Skeini & Others v United Kingdom, and its partner case of Al Jedda v United Kingdom, concerning whether the United Kingdom had any liability under the Convention for the alleged deaths and detention of individuals in SE Iraq during its military campaign there. [read post]
15 Apr 2021, 4:01 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme court overturned the decision of the lower court, which stated that the President acted unlawfully. [read post]
16 Jan 2013, 4:30 am by Guest Blogger
’”  (Catholic Charities of Sacramento, 32 Cal. 4th 527, 565 (2004), quoting United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 1:41 pm by David Kopel
Chicago brings the United States an important step closer to accomplishing a central purpose of the Fourteenth Amendment: making all of the Bill of Rights applicable to every state and local government in America. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 5:09 pm by Orin Kerr
But, unless I got that part right by accident, how an opinion in this case in 1971 from the Supreme Court of the United States might be “Elizabethan” eluded me. [read post]
18 Jun 2024, 11:44 am by Julia Kaye
Since it was approved in 2000, nearly 6 million people in the United States, and millions more globally, have used this medication. [read post]
29 Jul 2014, 5:01 pm by INFORRM
People that closed on their condos years ago still have not had their punch lists completed. . . . 3. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 11:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
The one case often pointed to by the “no exemptions for commercial activity” arguments is United States v. [read post]