Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6901 - 6920 of 9,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2011, 2:01 pm by Lawrence Solum
This article, then, argues that the Supreme Court ought to apply the Eighth Amendment in capital cases solely in terms of two distinct types of proportionality - absolute and relative. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 1:10 pm by Robert Thornton
Supreme Court has denied (pdf) two petitions that sought to have the Court resolve a Circuit split regarding the evaluation of economic impacts of critical habitat designations under the federal Endangered Species Act. [read post]
27 Feb 2011, 11:03 am
Lawsuits promptly ensued, and, in November, the Nebraska Supreme Court announced it would not rule on the case and kicked it back to the federal courts. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 9:18 am by azatty
Sarah "Sally" Simmons News from the Arizona Supreme Court: NEW PRESIDING JUDGE APPOINTED FOR PIMA COUNTY Thursday, February 24, 2011 – The Arizona Supreme Court has appointed the Honorable Sarah R. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 8:37 am by azatty
  When a unanimous Arizona Supreme Court decided Flagstaff Affordable Housing Limited Partnership v. [read post]
24 Feb 2011, 6:16 am by Juggalo Law
[Entertainment Weekly]Lindsay Lohan* More than 100 law professors are lobbying Congress to apply an ethics code to the Supreme Court. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 8:48 pm by Keith Rizzardi
Supreme Court denied two petitions requesting for review of how federal regulators and courts consider the economic impacts of "critical habitat" designations. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
Ariz. 1996) (reasoning that Arizona courts are not among those that would recognize a tort of compelled self-publication); Sarratore v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 8:36 pm by Holly Doremus
The Supreme Court today denied certiorari on two Endangered Species Act cases, Arizona Cattle Growers Association v. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 2:29 pm by Jay Rivera
  Birthright citizenship will be defended tooth and nail if it reaches the Supreme Court (which it may due to the issue of pre-emption- citizenship is a federal issue). [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
Taking things a step further, Ruthann Robson asks whether Congress can regulate Supreme Court ethics on the Constitutional Law Prof Blog. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 12:16 am by John Day
The Arizona Supreme Court has reversed prior law and held  that a claim for medical expenses arising out of a personal injury to a child may be asserted by the child or the parents, but not both. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 10:37 am
With the constitutionality of such legislation in question, it is possible that this issue will eventually be decided by the Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 7:02 am by Richard Posner
  The second lesson is the unwisdom of the Supreme Court’s recent decisions that have created—on the basis of a tendentious interpretation of the drafting history of the Second Amendment and an intellectually untenable (as it seems to me) belief in “originalist” interpretations of the Constitution—a constitutional right to possess guns for personal self-defense. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 6:00 am by Bill Raftery
A recent effort (SB 1481 of 2011) in Arizona to expand the state’s supreme court from 5 to 7 members was therefore curious in that it failed to include the chief justice in the development. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 2:00 am by John Day
 The United States Supreme Court stated that courts may not question the legitimacy of the public’s concern on a particular issue because such an approach would run the danger of the turning the courts into censors of what information is relevant to self-government. [read post]