Search for: "Billings v. United States"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 10,160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2012, 11:52 am
Ogden, touching on United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 11:38 am
Such laws would be unconstitutional and a direct challenge to Roe v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
United States that the US CVD law didn't apply to NME imports - for a rehearing. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm
Solicitor General, argued that case for the United States, that leaves Montana one vote short for either overruling or distinguishing Citizens United. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 6:32 pm
The Court held that Governor's reading of the Act would render the entire Act a nullity.The Court's decision in Michigan Building and Construction Trade Council, AFL-CIO v Synder permits local units of government and school districts to resume the practice of using project labor agreements on public projects.For more about Michigan Construction Law Update, click here.Update (3/7): Crain's Detroit Business reported today that Michigan Attorney General Bill… [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 12:30 pm
– The Volokh Conspiracy Are Historical Cell-Site Data Protected Under the Fourth Amendment After United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:21 am
In particular, the bill states: (b) EFFECTIVE DATE. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:13 am
United States) that threw everything into flux: My summary op-ed of the issue and my reasons for why Congress should just "do nothing. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 3:45 am
European states can readily regulate the content of speech, while the US Supreme Court, in Holder v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 12:47 pm
One of the earliest examples — demonstrating that even the courts would only grudgingly support the will of the voters — came in the case of People v. [read post]
3 Mar 2012, 7:32 am
United States, 260 U.S. 178, 190 (1922) (finding that Japanese immigrant was not eligible for naturalization); United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:38 am
Bank v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:05 am
"We note that the United States Patent and Trademark Office has released its position -- that it is a fair use for a patent applicant to submit a copy of non-patent art to the patent office to fulfill the disclosure requirement imposed by the patent regulations. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 5:02 am
A few weeks later I reported to active duty in the United States Air Force at Norton AFB, San Bernardino, CA. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:36 pm
Rather, “only those actions by the claimant which have the purpose and effect of causing the United States to pay out money it is not obligated to pay, or those actions which intentionally deprive the United States of money it is lawfully due, are properly considered ‘claims’ within the meaning of the FCA. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 2:27 pm
C-11-321 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS, CORPUS CHRISTI DIVISION 2012 U.S. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 12:55 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:32 am
United States v. [read post]
1 Mar 2012, 6:30 am
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the Montana campaign finance case as an example of “how the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision has upended important state campaign spending laws. [read post]
