Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 6901 - 6920 of 14,933
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
This drastic increase of more than 700 percent firmly secures women’s place as the fastest growing prison population and highlights the urgent need for a gender-responsive, trauma-informed approach to female incarceration in the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 7:40 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
(A.), where Justice Weagant put these TPS policies directly under scrutiny, [5] This case is about the street practices of a Toronto Anti-violence Intervention Strategy unit. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 12:40 pm by Tom Lamb
Given this situation, in early February 2017 the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established this consolidation of all federal court Eliquis cases, IN RE: ELIQUIS (APIXABAN) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION -- MDL No. 2754. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 6:27 am by Jim Sedor
The quandary expressed by justices was how to fashion a rule to protect the privacy of government employees and still ensure that public business was open to inspection. [read post]
10 Feb 2017, 5:38 am by Timothy P. Flynn
Department of Justice lawyers are preparing a petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Justice (DOJ) Office of Legal Counsel during the George W. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 6:08 pm by Peter Margulies
Some scholars have critiqued Chief Justice Roberts’ opinion as being unduly deferential (see my colleague Jared Goldstein’s piece here). [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 3:09 pm by Deborah Pearlstein
Texas); and rejected (unanimously) the continued vitality of much-cited dicta from the Court’s 1934’s United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 2:18 pm by Patrick A. Malone
He emerged to suggest only that the industry needed to make more of its products in the United States, dropping, among other issues, his long-standing advocacy for Medicare to negotiate lower drug prices. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 12:41 pm by Tom Smith
But it will be impossible for the justices to have missed those broadsides, which have extended to Chief Justice John Roberts himself. [read post]
8 Feb 2017, 10:26 am by Ed Stein
” The President did not provide much detail regarding why, as the EO concluded, “these actions constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign policy of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 2:10 pm by Alan J. Borsuk
” That is so simple yet so radical, he said, because the United States has never had a real commitment to it. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 1:08 pm by Michael Gerhardt
They can hold hearings and decide to take no further action, as occurred when the Senate could not invoke cloture to stop a filibuster against President Lyndon Johnson’s nomination of then-Justice Abe Fortas as Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
7 Feb 2017, 5:40 am by Scott Bomboy
” The Justice Department in its brief also claims that states can’t sue over the denial of entry into the United States of third-party aliens and that visa holders outside of the United States can’t sue if they are denied visas. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 12:38 pm by Victoria Kwan
Two decades after writing the landmark United States v. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 11:19 am by Jordan Brunner
The brief argues that immigration and economic growth are “intimately tied” and that the order could damage the United States’s ability to attract the world’s talent. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 10:08 am by Quinta Jurecic
This document envisions an Air Force where Airmen and autonomous systems work together as a team to meet a variety of challenges currently facing the United States, such as cyber-attacks, anti-access/area denial strategies, and attacks on space-based assets. [read post]
6 Feb 2017, 9:41 am by Dennis Crouch
Supreme Court’s Presumption of Judicial Review Since the days of Chief Justice John Marshall, the Supreme Court has relied on a strong presumption that judicial review is available for executive branch action.[4] Agency decisions are presumed to be reviewable, and preclusion statutes are construed narrowly. [read post]