Search for: "Defendants A-F" Results 6901 - 6920 of 29,830
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2018, 7:51 am by Joy Waltemath
“By its terms, §1182(f) exudes deference to the President in every clause,” wrote the Court. [read post]
RevClaims, LLC, 854 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. 2017) held that a “resident” is not the same as a “citizen” for purposes of CAFA’s local controversy exception. [read post]
RevClaims, LLC, 854 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. 2017) held that a “resident” is not the same as a “citizen” for purposes of CAFA’s local controversy exception. [read post]
RevClaims, LLC, 854 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. 2017) held that a “resident” is not the same as a “citizen” for purposes of CAFA’s local controversy exception. [read post]
RevClaims, LLC, 854 F.3d 962 (8th Cir. 2017) held that a “resident” is not the same as a “citizen” for purposes of CAFA’s local controversy exception. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 11:46 am by Robert Chesney
Let’s turn now to look at the new statutory definition Section 1622 would establish. b. 10 U.S.C § 130(g)(f)(1) Section 1622 provides an unexpected definition of “clandestine military activity or operation in cyberspace,” in what would become 10 U.S.C § 130(g)(f)(1). [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:44 pm by Orin Kerr
The Supreme Court’s decision in Carpenter v. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Guns and Ammo: Legally Storing, Moving, and Showing Them OffThe laws surrounding firearms in Canada are not only complex but they also involve a variety of federal laws and provincial regulations. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 11:57 am by Thomas Surmanski
Guns and Ammo: Legally Storing, Moving, and Showing Them Off The laws surrounding firearms in Canada are not only complex but they also involve a variety of federal laws and provincial regulations. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 8:47 am by Eugene Volokh
Applying Mandel's narrow standard of review to such a claim would run contrary to this Court's repeated admonition that "[f]acial neutrality is not determinative" in the Establishment Clause context. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: “[I]f an employee’s proselytizing interfered with work, the employer would not have to allow it. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 3:30 am by Eric B. Meyer
Equal Employment Opportunity Commission: “[I]f an employee’s proselytizing interfered with work, the employer would not have to allow it. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 6:57 pm by Eugene Volokh
But they do make clear that, in many cases, the ACLU will decline to defend the rights of people who disseminate it. [read post]