Search for: "Pass v. State"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 28,440
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jan 2013, 9:50 am
Additional Nokia v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 3:25 pm
After serving his sentence, Divito was extradited to the United States in 2005 to face drug-related charges there and he pleaded guilty. [read post]
12 Jan 2022, 10:29 am
San Francisco.Who: EFF Staff Attorney Saira Hussain What: Oral arguments on motion for summary judgment in Williams v. [read post]
1 Apr 2024, 2:59 am
Although the Circuit stated in passing that the foreseeable harm requirement applied to “all exemptions, except Exemption 3,” a more recent district court opinion correctly pointed out that foreseeable harm would “always” be present when the government properly invokes Exemption 1. [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
24 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
The court then explained that an "appointment of an individual from a constitutionally valid expired list violates Article V, §6 of the NY Constitution" citing Matter of City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768.* Nevertheless, in light of the conditional offer of employment given to Plaintiff, and his request for back pay, the Appellate Division denied the Respondents' request that the Appellate Division dismiss… [read post]
9 Jul 2015, 2:33 am
The court also found the registration system passed the Fourth Circuit test in SCV v. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 3:42 am
Concrete Mgmt, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 5:26 am
It is said that it should have applied the approach in Galloway v Telegraph ([2006] EWCA Civ 17) and should only have overturned the judge’s decision on balancing conflicting Convention rights if it was “plainly wrong”. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 12:44 pm
In September 2009, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed that holding in Jones v. [read post]
20 May 2012, 2:05 pm
(Randy Barnett) If the Supreme Court invalidates the individual insurance mandate, it need not call into question any other law that has ever been passed in the history of the United States. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 10:37 am
In D.C. v. [read post]
15 Mar 2017, 6:30 am
Most famously, all fifty states make 21 the legal drinking age because in the most important pre-Sebelius conditional funding case, South Dakota v. [read post]
24 May 2015, 8:03 pm
Both risks came to pass in this case. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 12:00 pm
The Supreme Court’s March 20, 2018 decision in Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2013, 11:00 am
In Shapira v. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 11:14 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:18 pm
In the case of A.K. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2015, 3:33 pm
WildEarth Guardians v. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 6:19 am
The New Jersey Supreme Court will hear oral argument in the matter of State v. [read post]
