Search for: "Pass v. State" Results 6901 - 6920 of 28,440
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Nov 2019, 8:21 am by Peter Margulies
District Court for the District of Oregon issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) in Doe v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 6:57 am by Eric Goldman
Backpage * District Court Ruling Highlights Congress’ Hastiness To Pass ‘Worst of Both Worlds FOSTA’– Doe 1 v. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:58 am by Bob Kraft
On that same day, President Eisenhower sent a letter to the Honorable Harvey V. [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 5:16 am
 The answer is 'yes', according to the ruling passed down at the beginning of November by His Honour Judge Hacon (sitting as a Deputy High Court Judge) in Bentley 1962 Limited and Brandlogic Limited v Bentley Motors Limited [2019] EWHC 2925 (Ch). [read post]
11 Nov 2019, 3:45 am by Peter Mahler
Baumann argued that, because the Operating Agreement is silent concerning the appointment or replacement of a managing agent, Rubin’s claim is governed by the default rule in LLC Law § 408(a) stating that management shall be “by affirmative vote of a majority of the managers. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 6:00 am by Terry Hart
Argument analysis: Justices pillage state arguments for sovereign immunity for copyright infringement — This week, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Allen v. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
Decisions about voter list maintenance, one of the most essential bureaucratic duties of state election officials, received intense scrutiny in several states this year. [read post]
8 Nov 2019, 2:59 am by Walter Olson
Advocates argue that Congress didn’t really end Indian reservation status for much of the state of Oklahoma even if everyone at the time thought it did [Will Baude on Sharp v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit’s decision in Zen Magnets v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 1:55 pm by David Cole
    REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM As a candidate, Trump promised to overturn Roe v. [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 7:03 am by Roel van Woudenberg
The Guidelines 2018 and 2019, section H-V, 3.1, provides: If the amendment by replacing or removing a feature from a claim fails to pass the following test by at least one criterion, it necessarily contravenes the requirements of Art. 123(2): (i)-(iii)However, even if the above criteria are met, the division must still ensure that the amendment by replacing or removing a feature from a claim satisfies the requirements of Art. 123(2) as they also have been set out in G… [read post]
7 Nov 2019, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” The editorial board of The Wall Street Journal (subscription required) urges the justices to “do a public and legal service by stating clearly that current law excludes groundwater, and the only way to change that is by passing a new law through Congress. [read post]