Search for: "People v Friend"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 7,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jan 2008, 1:23 pm
For instance, in a study of 414 secondary students in South Africa it was found that "friend" was the most commonly described perpetrator of all types of sexual abuse (Madu & Peltzer, 2001). [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 3:35 pm
People v. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:57 am
Eke v. [read post]
9 Jan 2008, 7:21 am
On Monday I attended the oral argument before the Supreme Court in Baze v. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 4:17 pm
Bad Move #1.The police drag you and one of your friends in for interrogation. [read post]
7 Jan 2008, 3:42 am
Lindor's legal defense in UMG v. [read post]
4 Jan 2008, 10:00 am
The question in the Kentucky case of Baze v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 8:08 pm
A helpful reader alerted me to a fascinating opinion from the Oregon Court of Appeals in Oregon v. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 12:48 pm
He gave away large sums to people he thought were friends, and then, in need of money, sold his house at a deep discount to the first person who offered to buy it. [read post]
26 Dec 2007, 10:17 am
Be that as it may, the following cautionary tale comes to us from our friends to the southeast in Galveston, from a Texas Court of Appeals case, Indian Beach Property Owners' Association v. [read post]
21 Dec 2007, 11:59 am
I remember sending her P V Baker QC's great work Snell on Equity’ * many years ago - with a bookmark at the page on secret trusts. [read post]
18 Dec 2007, 1:38 am
Justice Cardozo in Palko v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 4:31 am
New York dealt with this recently when a federal judge struck down in Alexanxder v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 10:11 pm
Circuit's opinion in Abigail Alliance v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
Good Lord we trust you as a friend. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
14 Dec 2007, 12:01 am
U.S. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 7:38 am
This is investigation, not discovery, and although these people might have confidential information that a litigant might not want the source to share with an adverse attorney,there is no law prohibiting the attempt to interview these people. [read post]
12 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Click here to see a copy of Blake v. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 5:37 pm
Oh wait, there is no constitutional right to education (Kadrmas v. [read post]
