Search for: "State v. B. V." Results 6901 - 6920 of 41,773
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2020, 12:08 pm by Jeanne Huang
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Schlunk decided by the Supreme Court of the US and Segers and Rufa BV v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 5:06 am by Schachtman
They are raising speculative questions about the electoral processes of entire states, even where the states in question have handed them notable wins down ballot. [1]  Walter N. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) makes its third trip to the Supreme Court today under the caption California v. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 11:18 am by Giles Peaker
Prempeh v Lakhany (2020) EWCA Civ 1422 We saw this case on a first appeal in the County Court. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ambach, 118 AD2d 932. *** Although all public officers of the State are public employees, not all public employees of the State are public officers. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Ambach, 118 AD2d 932. *** Although all public officers of the State are public employees, not all public employees of the State are public officers. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 3:31 am by Peter Mahler
The notice stated that Lard-PT either could purchase Kolmar’s 51% interest for approximately $10.4 million or it could sell its 49% interest to Kolmar for $10 million. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 2:44 am by Patrick Bourke and Stuart Neely (UK)
In fact, the Directive provides that Member States should take steps to facilitate the submission of such complaints. [read post]
9 Nov 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Wednesday 11 November, the Supreme Court will hear the case of A and B v Criminal Injuries Compensation Authority and Anor. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 2:12 pm by Giles Peaker
This was with reference to the judgment of HHJ Luba QC in Pavey v LB Hackney. [read post]
8 Nov 2020, 12:51 pm by Giles Peaker
Moreover, charities do not have the same resources as the state, so if the state is entitled to use bright line criteria for distribution of benefits, still more will that be true for a charity. [read post]