Search for: "State v. Force"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 32,544
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 May 2020, 4:18 pm
FOOTNOTES [1] The FAQ does not carry the force and effect of law independent of the CARES Act and regulations on which it is based. [2] The FAQ is supplemental to the (i) First Interim Final Rule issued by the SBA on April 2, 2020, (ii) Second Interim Final Rule issued by the SBA on April 3, 2020, (iii) Third Interim Final Rule issued by the SBA on April 14, 2020, (iv) Fourth Interim Finale Rule issued by the SBA on April 24, 2020; (v) Fifth Interim Final Rule issued by the SBA on… [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:34 pm
Congress cannot force states to take action directly; but it can condition funds on states taking those actions. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
Yoo and LaCroix commented on how that executive order squares with a Supreme Court decision that shaped modern understanding of presidential power— Youngstown Sheet & Tube Company v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:26 pm
G.S. 15A-1344(f)(3); State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 1:43 pm
Washington and Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 10:15 am
But it does not cut back that statute in nearly the way that Skilling v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 8:57 am
Virnetx Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 6:23 am
The Supreme Court established in Missouri v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 6:30 pm
They compare it to Clinton Administration Solicitor General Drew Days' famous mistake in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 3:58 pm
Both Jon and Mike referenced the infamous exchange from United States v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 1:20 pm
The streets deserted apart from roving estate agents, dead eyes above the mask, looking for someone, anyone, to force into a viewing in an enclosed space. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:41 am
Among his numerous successes is the $570M breach of contract and patent infringement verdict for his client in Medtronic v. [read post]
12 May 2020, 4:00 am
Trump v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 4:02 pm
He reaffirmed the Court of Appeal’s finding in Campbell v MGN Ltd [2002] EWCA Civ 1373 that the defendant’s state of mind is irrelevant to the tort of misuse of private information. [read post]
11 May 2020, 12:25 pm
In McPherson v. [read post]
11 May 2020, 8:07 am
Armed Forces and practitioner-scholars from Canada, New Zealand and the Netherlands. [read post]
11 May 2020, 3:19 am
The ongoing coronavirus / COVID-19 pandemic has quite literally impacted everyone and everything in New York, including the courts, which were forced to temporarily cease non-essential functions. [read post]
11 May 2020, 1:09 am
In my last post,[1] I praised Lee Mickus’s recent policy paper on amending Rule 702 for its persuasive force on the need for an amendment, as well as a source for helping lawyers anticipate common judicial dodges to a faithful application of the rule.[2] There are multiple dodges used by judicial dodgers, and it behooves litigants to recognize and anticipate them. [read post]
10 May 2020, 8:01 am
” Coons v. [read post]
10 May 2020, 4:05 am
In Ilias and Ahmed v. [read post]
