Search for: "State v. Holder" Results 6901 - 6920 of 7,213
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Aug 2019, 1:14 pm by Jim Walker
These governmental filings state that the items included “plastic straws, plastic knives, rubber bands, plastic corn on the cob holders, broken plastic cups, paper clips, aluminum bottle caps, aluminum foil wrappers,” and other items. [read post]
30 Jan 2017, 4:27 am by SHG
” President Andrew Jackson famously responded to the Supreme Court’s 1832 decision in Worcester v. [read post]
21 May 2019, 11:57 pm by Florian Mueller
The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) of the United States has won the first round of litigation against Qualcomm. [read post]
26 Nov 2015, 6:19 am by Ben
Back in 2004, Californian state senator Kevin Murray wrote this in a report in US recording industry practices:“Much like the public generally dislikes politicians, but love their individual representatives, Artists have respect for their record company handlers, but distrust the companies themselves and the system they operate under. [read post]
29 Aug 2017, 7:31 am by JB
Recent events are additional evidence for my thesis that we are at the end of the Reagan regime and in the midst of disjunctive presidency.A central reason why Trump is getting nothing done is that the Republican coalition of the Reagan regime—which currently controls both national and most state governments—is far weaker than it appears on the surface. [read post]
8 Apr 2019, 6:00 am by Sandy Levinson
”  One might compare this, ruefully, with the fact that not only Holder, but also his boss, the former President of the Harvard Law Review and a former member of the University of Chicago Law School faculty, never once offered an interesting observation about the United States Constitution and the vision presumably underlying it nor indicated any deep interest in molding the federal judiciary through judicial appointments. [read post]
14 Aug 2009, 12:39 pm
In Fedsure Life Assurance Ltd v Greater Johannesburg Transitional Metropolitan Council, the principle of legality was held to mean that a body exercising public power is required to act within the powers lawfully given to it, and in President of the Republic of South Africa v South African Rugby Football Union, the principle necessitated that the holder of the public power must act in good faith and not misconstrue his powers. [read post]
6 Feb 2012, 5:08 am by Max Kennerly, Esq.
 Once granted, the patent has immense value, and is protected against all but the strongest invalidity challenges thanks to the Supreme Court’s opinion in Microsoft v. i4i last summer. [read post]