Search for: "State v. Su"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 30,106
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Dec 2009, 8:44 am
In Franco v. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:32 pm
Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), which requires a property owner to utilize available state compensation remedies prior to suing in federal court for a regulatory taking or inverse condemnation. [read post]
1 Oct 2007, 3:32 pm
Hamilton Bank, 473 U.S. 172 (1985), which requires a property owner to utilize available state compensation remedies prior to suing in federal court for a regulatory taking or inverse condemnation. [read post]
23 Sep 2011, 1:29 pm
" Id. at 59-60 (quoting United States v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
The Facts of Colwell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 11:42 am
The Facts of Colwell v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:42 pm
The Facts of Colwell v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 7:35 am
She sued under a state tort law theory, which does not provide a cause of action—that’s what the state’s employment discrimination statute is for. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 4:30 am
State Farm Lloyds and Erin Strachan v. [read post]
5 Jun 2020, 2:00 am
Ferdinand Benjamin v. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 5:37 pm
., and Sunrise Global Marketing, Inc. sued Cobalt Holdings, Inc., in federal court alleging fraud, breach of contract, and several state-law claims. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 4:43 am
Yesterday the Court heard oral arguments in Shapiro v. [read post]
30 Sep 2008, 11:19 am
US Circuit Court of Appeals rules that New York State law provides for "employment-at-will" absent a constitutionally impermissible action by the employerMarsha Bartel v NBC Universal, Inc., USCA 7th Circuit, Docket # 07-3913New York State follows the common law doctrine of at-will employment. [read post]
25 Aug 2010, 11:40 am
EPA was sued by some States and environmental groups who challenged the legitimacy of the ozone standard -75 parts per billion (ppb)- selected by the Bush Administration. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 4:00 am
"The Pena court, citing City of New York v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 93 NY2d 768, said that only if Pena’s challenge to the list itself was successful would she have a remedy that comports with Article V, §6 of the New York State Constitution, in that the original list would have had no legal existence and thus could not have expired, allowing for extension of a 'corrected' list. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 4:27 am
See Kason Indus. v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 3:03 pm
Co. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 6:14 am
After the Supreme Court held in Lucia v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 1:29 pm
" On March 10, 1998, SEB sued Sunbeam in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, alleging that Sunbeam's sales infringed the '312 patent (the "Sunbeam Suit"). [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 3:13 pm
While the Supreme Court in the case of United States v. [read post]
