Search for: "United States v. Close" Results 6901 - 6920 of 14,200
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Oct 2015, 5:34 am by Elina Saxena
Michael Knapp provided a primer on United States v. [read post]
2 Jun 2020, 8:03 am by Mark Movsesian
] Last weekend, the Supreme Court rejected a California church's application for a temporary injunction against enforcement of a state public-health order limiting attendance at houses of worship (South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
18 Jul 2022, 2:46 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Regular readers of this blog know my view that the  rise of collective investor actions outside the United States is one of the most important developments in the world of directors’ and officers’ liability in recent years. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am by Florian Mueller
For the period prior to closing (and, therefore, prior to any grant-back obligation), Microsoft offered to pay royalties of 2 eurocents ($0.026) per unit for the first 10 million licensed units, and 1 eurocents ($0.013) per unit for all units above 10 million units (clause 3.1.1). [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 12:55 pm by Betty Lupinacci
A few years ago, after a major inventorying project, the Law Library’s collection of United States Court of Appeals Records and Briefs was sentto our state-of-the-art off-site storage at Fort Meade for safekeeping. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 7:53 pm by Matthew Bush
United StatesDocket: 11-959Issue(s): (1) Whether, when a false statement is made to an individual who has no connection whatsoever to the federal government, the false statement is nonetheless made in a “matter within the jurisdiction” of the United States, in violation of 18 U.S.C. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 4:08 pm by Sex Crimes
United States, 277 U.S. 438, 470 (1928) (Holmes, J., dissenting). [read post]
9 Oct 2015, 6:20 am by Eugene Volokh
Barner took out his gun, stood up, and walked down the hallway into the living room with Adams following closely behind him. [read post]
8 Sep 2010, 9:21 pm by Jeralyn
If today's decision is allowed to stand, the United States will have closed its courtroom doors to torture victims while providing complete immunity to their torturers. [read post]
18 Aug 2014, 5:26 am
After Louis Colon–Gentile was charged “in a seven-count indictment with distribution, receipt, and possession of child pornography, in violation of Title 18, United States Code §§ 2252(a)(2), 2252(a)(4)(B), 2252(b)(1) and  2252(b)(2)”, he moved to suppress “physical evidence and statements he made, on the ground that they were obtained in violation of the 4th Amendment. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]