Search for: "United States v. New York"
Results 6901 - 6920
of 16,015
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2016, 4:18 am
Burger, 482 US. 69] (1987), temporary baggage seizures, United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 9:33 am
The United States media, in contrast, has long enjoyed immunity from politicians suing over scrutiny of their public conduct. [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 6:07 am
At no time was the United States Government or any federal official a party to any action.The particular proceeding that came to the Supreme Court as Medellin v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 10:19 am
United States, 466 F.2d 1059 (9th Cir. 1972). [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 8:02 am
If that’s CDCR’s argument, it’s plainly wrong: in United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2016, 6:22 am
Hugunin v. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 12:39 pm
” As a result, government mandates requiring people to speak are subject to strict scrutiny—the most stringent standard of judicial review in the United States. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
New Eng. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:26 pm
In the following guest post, John Reed Stark, President of John Reed Stark Consulting and former Chief of the SEC’s Office of Internet Enforcement, sorts out the issues involved in the battle between Apple and the government, in light of all the circumstances, including the February 29, 2016 opinion by Eastern District of New York Judge James Orenstein in the separate Apple iPhone unlocking case. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:09 pm
Bank of the United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 12:00 pm
Supreme Court granted certiorari review of United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 9:49 am
Desito, United States District Judge for the Northern District of New York Judge Mae D'Agostino granted summary judgment for... [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 7:23 am
Padell – United States District Court – Southern District of New York – March 1st, 2016 – In this case involving a contract dispute over the funding of a movie, the Plaintiffs have filed a motion to exclude the Defendants expert witnesses’ testimony. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 7:32 pm
The case is Lockhart v. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 2:49 pm
United States ended in a result readily understandable to the non-technical observer: the convicted sex offender lost. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 1:51 pm
Arnold is admitted to practice in all state courts in North Carolina, in the United States Federal Court for the Western District of North Carolina, in the North Carolina Court of Appeals and Supreme Court, and in the Fourth Circuit United States Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 8:51 am
Suppose a real estate agent promised to find a client “a house, condo, or apartment in New York. [read post]
1 Mar 2016, 3:39 am
United States and the judicial-recusal case Williams v. [read post]
