Search for: "WASHINGTON V. STATE" Results 6901 - 6920 of 17,051
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2011, 6:17 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
Colorado was one of a handful of states - along with South Carolina, Washington and a few others - which held that continued employment was not sufficient consideration for an at-will employee's agreement to a non-competition covenant. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am by Edith Roberts
The first is United States v. [read post]
27 Nov 2018, 4:01 am by Edith Roberts
” Additional coverage comes from Erin Cox for The Washington Post. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
P. 12(b)(6) (stating that a complaint may be dismissed for `failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted’). [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:28 am by Amy Howe
In his column for The Washington Post, Joe Davidson weighs in on the whistleblower case Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am by Edith Roberts
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
Last Thursday’s ruling in POM Wonderful v. [read post]
3 Nov 2020, 3:30 am by Brian Bix
However, outside a handful of states (e.g., Washington State, with its status of “Committed Intimate Relationship”), and excluding the small number of couples who enter detailed written agreements, unmarried cohabitants are still treated as legal strangers. [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 1:08 pm by Dennis Westlind
A similar ruling from the Washington Court of Appeals is being reviewed by that state’s supreme court.? [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 6:29 am by Kiran Bhat
Yesterday the American Bar Association filed an amicus brief in Smith v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 4:24 am by Edith Roberts
At The George Washington Law Review’s On the Docket blog, Michael Selmi is surprised, not by the outcome in Epic Systems v. [read post]
29 May 2015, 3:00 am by Jeff Welty
It thus effectively overruled State v. [read post]
5 Feb 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
For The Washington Post, Robert Barnes reports that although “[o]pponents of gerrymandering have won a historic string of victories in the courts recently,” “millions of voters will cast their ballots this fall in districts that judges have declared to be unconstitutional,” because “the justices have routinely told states found to be offenders that they do not have to immediately redraw the maps. [read post]