Search for: "Bills v. State"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 21,856
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jun 2018, 11:52 am
In last year’s Meyer v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 5:32 am
This case is a huge personal win for Joseph Groia, who has been carrying this burden since after R. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2018, 3:02 am
Last week IPKat was also delighted to host a guest post from Professor Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge) on the state of the debate around the proposed EU press publishers’ right: Sleepwalking towards a perpetual (news?) [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:07 pm
United States, where the court is being asked to rule on the permissibility of the police using phone records without a warrant. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 5:56 am
It also means that all other states are now free to introduce bills to legalize and regulate sports betting. [read post]
2 Jun 2018, 4:54 am
Haslam signed the appropriations bill. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 5:55 pm
In a decision handed down this week, R. v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 3:23 pm
By Lane V. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:35 am
Addressing the concerns raised by the concurrence/dissent, defendants certainly could have requested a bill of particulars or moved for a more definite statement under CPLR 3024. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 4:17 am
” At the Election Law Blog, Bill Whitford, the lead plaintiff in partisan-gerrymandering case Gill v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 9:01 pm
As I explain in more detail below as I parse the complaint in the United States v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 7:45 am
Upon Unconstitutionality Actions 3729, 3751; Against Legislative Bill Bulletin No. 9895-11 Jason Rudall, Certain Activities Carried Out by Nicaragua in the Border Area (Costa Rica v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:00 am
In a recent case, Velez v. [read post]
31 May 2018, 2:00 am
In a recent case, Velez v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 7:15 am
First, the agreements were individually and freely negotiated, and they expressly stated that the liquidated damages were not intended to constitute a penalty. [read post]
30 May 2018, 5:55 am
The bill would preempt the state and common law protections that sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972 have always enjoyed and make them subject to federal copyright protection. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:36 am
• Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
30 May 2018, 4:00 am
” As readers know, it’s difficult for the executive to prevail in traditional Category 3 cases, but Zivotofsky v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 1:54 pm
Policy considerations and implications in United States v. [read post]
