Search for: "Doe, Appeal of" Results 6921 - 6940 of 108,024
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Apr 2023, 6:13 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
" The Court of Appeals (Chin, Leval and Lee) states, "Defendants' decision to disqualify Matzell from enrolling in Shock diverged from the sentencing court's order and implicated his liberty interest in having his sentence implemented in a manner consistent with law and the sentencing court's order. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 5:36 am by John Coyle
FG Hemisphere Associates LLC (2011), in which the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal had to decide whether to follow China’s position on foreign state immunity. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
Assuming that's not an unexcused procedural default, AEDPA doesn't apply--but Trump still loses, because when AEDPA doesn't apply, the prior SCOTUS doctrine that AEDPA mostly codified does. [read post]
12 Apr 2023, 12:58 am by Florian Mueller
Apart from the fact that they don't take into consideration that courts in different countries in which a European patent is in force may arrive at different essentiality determinations, and that such decisions may be appealed, there's another fundamental problem:It's hardly ever going to happen. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 4:20 pm
True that.On the merits, the Court of Appeal reverses the trial court, which kept Mr. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 2:44 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
“Insufficient prior understanding of the inherent properties of a known composition does not defeat a finding of anticipation. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 1:30 pm by Edward Hardin, Jr. and Shearil Matthews
The Court of Appeal reasoned that the Louisiana Employment Discrimination Law, specifically La.R.S. 23:332, does not provide protections for persons based on their sexual orientation or status as a transgender person. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 9:22 am by Berry Law
Ensuring that you file your appeal paperwork properly without any errors. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:21 am by Ashley Holland
By contrast, as the court of appeals correctly recognized, Section 101 excludes non-technological methods of organizing human activity like the luggage-inspection method claimed in Tropp. [read post]