Search for: "IN THE INTEREST OF: T. S." Results 6921 - 6940 of 182,485
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 May 2023, 8:00 am by Stephen Bilkis
The primary concern of the court is to ensure that the child’s best interests are protected and promoted. [read post]
20 Dec 2022, 6:05 am by Benjamin Wittes
You don’t get to elicit gasps twice from Cassidy Hutchinson’s testimony. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 6:03 pm
For those who haven't yet experimented with Twitter, or are just getting started, here's a short introduction that provides some background, tools and resources for using twitter effectively. [read post]
22 Jan 2019, 4:32 pm by INFORRM
The judgment doesn’t deal with the interesting issue of what status Mr Green had under the rules, i.e. whether he should have been treated as a ‘duly accredited journalist’ (see FPR Rule 27.11(7)). [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 2:55 pm
The upshot being that the nature of a claimant’s legal interest in land is by the by for a claim in nuisance, assuming that they are in possession of the land. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 11:44 am
It's interesting that the O decided this week to go after Portland commissioner Randy Leonard for his pet project spending with water bureau money. [read post]
11 Jul 2011, 8:33 am by Kevin Johnson - Guest
[t]he person to be arrested has committed a crime that makes the person removable from the United States. [read post]
21 May 2008, 3:01 pm
I feel like I can't really move on to any other real topics until I wrap-up the "Vic the hypocrite" issue.I think it is really interesting that the comments really run the gamut. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 7:36 am by Daniel Shaviro
 He notes the problem of, say, deciding where interest should be deducted, when a multinational has both interest expense and gross income that presumably was produced by using the borrowed funds. [read post]
22 May 2008, 2:48 pm
Fortunately the last name has one too many "t"s to be our own Judge Mathews the Greatest.The central issue in Matthews is whether a trial counsel's rebuttal argument could properly comment on a defense witness's 13 invocations of his Fifth Amendment rights while being crossed and whether the military judge (who was the trier of fact) could draw an adverse inference based on those invocations. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 7:22 am
But Marco raises interesting points on 'client control,' a term that I don't like, as (1) it is not what our job is; and (2) it can't be done. [read post]
8 Apr 2008, 10:00 pm
There’s an interesting conversation going on at Madisonian.net. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 4:00 pm
A former U.S. attorney, Holder is among Washington’s most prominent defense attorneys. [read post]