Search for: "Mark"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 151,817
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Nov 2014, 3:09 am
" Moreover, in a design plus word mark, the words are normally given greater weight.Here, both marks begin with "CUTLERYAND," and the Board noted consumers are most likely to remember the first part of a mark. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 3:34 am
Even if consumers notice the "O" in respondent's mark, they will see HOPNOTIC as a variation of the HPNOTIQ mark that suggests a connection between "hops" and beer.The marks are also similar in pronunciation. [read post]
19 Aug 2021, 4:12 am
The USPTO refused registration of the mark GENRESTORE, finding confusion likely with the registered mark RESTOREGEN, both for dietary supplements. [read post]
18 May 2018, 4:03 am
"The Marks: Because of the strong visual resemblance between the marks, the Board found the commercial impressions of the marks to be "fairly similar," and the marks as in their entireties to be "similar. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 3:10 am
But what about the marks? [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 3:53 am
" Applicant argued, without success, that the mark POWER TECH is so inherently weak that it should not preclude registration of the applied-for mark. [read post]
4 Jun 2013, 1:19 am
In re Lettuce Entertain You Enterprises, Inc., Serial No. 85291663 (May 17, 2013 [not precedential].The Board first insisted that PIZZA BAR be disclaimed in Applicant's mark, rejecting the contention that the mark, as a whole, is unitary.As to the comparison of the marks at issue, because Applicant's mark is in standard character form, the Board must assume that it could be used in any manner, including in the same form of display as that of the cited… [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 4:22 am
’” Applicant argued, however, that consumers would not "stop and translate" the mark, and therefore that the marks are not confusingly similar. [read post]
20 Aug 2014, 2:49 am
Applicant, in turn, claimed that the cited mark is weak in view of numerous VS marks used on similar goods, but she failed to provide any supporting evidence. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 2:57 am
Two marks are legally equivalent when a "consumer would consider them both the same mark. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:06 am
In short, the mark stands on its own. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 3:49 am
Applicant David Ceniceros argued, inter alia, that the marks differ in appearance and sound, and further that the cited mark is used only in connection with "Celtic-themed music. [read post]
10 Nov 2016, 3:22 am
TMEP Section 807.12(d).The issue before the Board was whether FILAMENT TOWER "is a complete mark or merely part of a larger mark. [read post]
5 May 2022, 4:25 am
Affirming the district court's entry of summary judgment, the court agreed that the manner in which the marks are used weighed against a finding of likely confusion, noting that Lodestar's mark appeared on the back of the bottle "below a considerable amount of writing," and that both parties used the involved marks as tag lines subordinate to their house marks. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 4:09 am
It observed that the proposed mark and the prior standard character mark differ only by the disclaimed terms "RESORT" and "HOTEL," dnd the proposed mark does not differ meaningfully from the word-plus-design mark. [read post]
18 Aug 2017, 3:28 am
Turning to the marks, Applicant translated its mark from the Swahili to English as the word "life. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
The Board noted the obvious similarities and differences in the involved marks, concluding that "because Opposer’s marks are strong and the goods are identical, consumers may perceive Applicant’s marks as designating a product line extension of Opposer’s watches. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 3:50 am
" The law is clear that only the owner of the mark may file a use-based application for registration; if the entity filing the application is not the owner of the mark as of the filing date, the application is void ab initio. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:48 am
The goods are identical, but what about the marks? [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 8:33 am
(That's a monopoly on the word as a mark.) [read post]
