Search for: "Moring v. State" Results 6921 - 6940 of 131,050
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2023, 3:09 am by Matrix Law
The appellants argued that uncertainty in the law has arisen following the decision in Sandeman in which the Court of Appeal stated that Buchanan should not be applied any more widely than respect for the doctrine of precedent requires. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
He then proceeds to introduce the case that brings us all to the Miami federal courthouse—or, rather, that brought us here 27 hours ago: The United States of America v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:55 am by Daniel Carpenter-Gold
Yesterday, the UCLA Environmental Law Clinic filed a brief in the California Restaurant Association v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:28 am by Spencer Reynolds
In its justification for the arrest, the state of Georgia cited the U.S. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 6:52 am by Richard Hunt
 These are matters of state law, not federal law, and they vary from state to state. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 12:15 am
  He has the authority to call the legislature into special session pursuant to Article V, Section 9 of the Nevada Constitution which provides: "the Governor may, on extraordinary occasions, convene the Legislature by Proclamation and shall state to both houses, when organized, the business for which they have been specially convened". [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 10:30 pm by Sherica Celine
State Law Comparison Tool for ABCs Mega Chapter 11 Filings Tracker Subchapter V Decision Tracker Bank Failure Resource Kit This resource kit assembles Practical Guidance resources covering topics related to the recent bank failures. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 8:25 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health Organization (Dobbs), the court overturned Roe v Wade, which had protected abortion rights since 1973; abortion bans went into effect immediately in several states and more are forthcoming. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 1:09 pm by admin
Many other courts have done much the same, both in state[18] and in federal courts,[19] and both before and after the Supreme Court decided Daubert, and even after Rule 702 was amended in 2000.[20] Perhaps even more disturbing is that the current edition of the Reference Manual on Scientific Evidence glibly cites to the Wells case, for the dubious proposition that “Generally, researchers are conservative when it comes to assessing causal relationships, often calling for… [read post]