Search for: "People v Friend"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 7,207
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
El-Farargy v El-Farargy & ors [2007] EWCA Civ 1149 S v L ( online version here) Re Judge Restaino and s 44 of the Judiciary Law (online version here) Friends of Jesus v Tiberus et al (petition 965/2007: petition here) State of Montana v Andrew McCormack (unreported, but copy included in a blog post here) That’s all I can find - a lot of the others are comments in unreported proceedings or things said before a jury or in… [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 7:18 am
The second tier is the investigatory or Terry stop, named after the seminal case Terry v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 1:47 pm
Supreme Court ruling in Kimbrough v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 11:15 am
Many of you may be aware of the Mikaloff decision in a federal court in northern Ohio, where the judge said residency restrictions are punishment and cannot be applied retroactively… [regarding the Hyle v. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:57 am
In the context of the current Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 4:40 pm
This network of people retained the lawyer when they had a need for legal services and referred friends, co-employees, business associates, and relatives to the lawyer. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 5:36 am
If an ex-spouse or ex-friend reveals your secrets, they can be liable. [read post]
8 Dec 2007, 2:31 am
Realtime (chat) v. long-term (book, blog); solo (writing/programming) v. collaborative. [read post]
7 Dec 2007, 5:02 am
Jones v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 11:20 am
For example, there is a federal case named Henderson v. [read post]
6 Dec 2007, 7:45 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 10:08 pm
It allows friends and foes alike to remain in detention. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 4:02 pm
Oops.Weird sex stuff leads people to make irrational decisions sometimes, huh? [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:39 am
In fact, 65% of the people UCP affiliates serve have a disability other than cerebral palsy. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 3:57 am
But fortunately for us, and by extension all of you reading this, one of our old friends (and a dedicated reader) was there - Tom Parker, an Ohio lawyer we've worked with on important medical device cases for years.Here's what he has to say about the Riegel oral argument:[It's all Tom from here on, until further notice - except for our bracketed comments, of course]The oral argument in Riegel v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 7:06 pm
"All three of the trial court judges in Lafayette County Circuit Court recused themselves on the matter of Jones v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 5:24 pm
” Commonwealth v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 11:50 am
" Since ruling in Batson v. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 12:22 am
Balducci -- many people in these parts are contemptuous. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 8:48 am
More on Snyder v. [read post]
