Search for: "Peter v. Peter"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 8,635
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
How a watch manufacturer could make the use of foreign manuscripts and artwork a copyright violation
12 Jul 2010, 2:24 am
(by Peter Hirtle) One wouldn’t normally expect a lawsuit between a watch manufacturer (Omega) and a big-box retailer (COSTCO) about the scope of “gray-market” sales of manufactured goods to have much of an impact on libraries and archives, but the upcoming Supreme Court case of Costco v. [read post]
11 Jul 2010, 3:30 pm
Their first posting is 7 drafts of a previously unpublished opinion: Ruthenberg v. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 4:27 am
"Previous IPBiz post: Men at Work's "Down Under" stolen from Australian teacher A post on soulshine evoked the concept of "common sense" found in KSR v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 1:16 pm
GmbH v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am
(Review of Ian Bremmer, The End of the Free Market: Who Wins the War Between States and Corporations? [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:58 am
As an update to my June 30 post regarding New Process Steel v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:53 am
Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Snippets can be downloaded here: http://www.mbhb.com/snippets/bilski Topics include: Viewpoints on Life After Bilski v. [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 3:58 am
Each of the remanded cases will be considered by a three-member panel of the Board that will include Chairman Wilma Liebman and Board Member Peter Schaumber (who made up the two-member panel that initially ruled on each case). [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 9:36 pm
" Peter J. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 7:07 pm
Where the brief cites the 1941 decision in Hines v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:46 pm
Another key case is a 1941 case called Hines v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 11:51 am
As the Supreme Court stated in footnote 35 of Stone v. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 5:00 am
Peter Phillips here and here. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
” Meanwhile, back in the courts, a Haringey social worker involved in the Baby Peter case has recovered libel damages from Haringey Council which libelled her on its website. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 9:12 am
But in R. v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:32 am
PearseHocker v US 00269 [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 4:53 pm
As we previously reported on our blog, on June 17, the United States Supreme Court, in New Process Steel v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 12:42 pm
For example, in the Peters v Kiff decision, he recognized the importance of the right to trial by jury when he held that a white criminal defendant could challenge the exclusion of black jurors. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 3:29 am
”Kim Kreis, et al. v. [read post]
