Search for: "Sell v. Sell"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 23,639
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Oct 2017, 1:12 pm
He tried to figure out how he could defend himself, knowing that to do so would likely mean selling his personal assets to afford a lawyer. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 10:08 am
(credit: Universal Studios et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2017, 8:14 am
Chase Manhattan: Southern District of Florida In the case of Chase Manhattan Mortgage Corp. v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 1:43 pm
The court noted that its decision Alphin v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 11:11 am
Delman v. [read post]
Advancing ‘draw’ against future commissions ok, but post-termination payback policy may violate FLSA
16 Oct 2017, 6:32 am
The employer operates 25 HHGregg stores in Ohio and over 200 nationwide, selling appliances, furniture, and electronics. [read post]
15 Oct 2017, 4:05 pm
On 18 October 2017 the trial in Soobhan v Bandal will begin. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 9:59 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Last month, we reported on a decision in Natural Alternatives International, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 2:10 pm
In Right Field Rooftops, LLC v. [read post]
12 Oct 2017, 4:29 am
An elderly couple sells some real estate and want to insulate the proceeds for estate planning purposes, specifically Medicare planning. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 12:01 pm
Fisher for petitioners (Art Lien) The plaintiffs in Jesner v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:50 am
District of Columbia v. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 8:17 am
When doing this a seller has to confirm it is selling the same product, but evidently that confirmation is not checked. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 4:54 am
In Teresa Scassa, University of OttawaIn Keatley Surveying Ltd. v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 8:00 am
Furthermore, as conditions of default, the Practice was prohibited from (1) selling any existing or future account receivables to any third party without the Plaintiff’s consent or (2) entering into any financing agreement requiring daily or weekly repayments. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:50 am
Semco, LLC v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 5:50 am
Semco, LLC v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 9:40 am
In 2010 during Hartfield v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
Finally, Professor Brian JM Quinn of the Boston College Law School filed an interesting amicus brief in Koshy in which he urged the court to take guidance from the Delaware Supreme Court’s recent decision in Shawe v Elting authorizing a sale of the highly profitable TransPerfect company based on the irreconcilable deadlock between its two owners. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 3:29 am
., impasse over distributions or the hiring or firing of key personnel, but I’ve seen no attempt to fashion an overall framework for evaluating claims of deadlock, that is, until last month’s opinion in Koshy v Sachdev (read here) in which the Supreme Judicial Court of Massachusetts, in its first-ever effort to construe that state’s deadlock-dissolution statute, devised a four-factor test to determine whether a “true deadlock” exists. [read post]
