Search for: "United States v. Herring" Results 6921 - 6940 of 23,699
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Apr 2016, 8:56 am by Eugene Volokh
First, “the public accusations by Van Liew that Stansfield was ‘corrupt and a liar’” were fully protected speech: These remarks about a local public official constituted political speech and were at the core of the speech that the First Amendment to the United States Constitution protects. [read post]
21 Aug 2021, 2:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
Howell (D.D.C.) in April, but just posted on Westlaw: Plaintiff is an Assistant United States Attorney ("AUSA") in the United States Attorney's Office for the District of Columbia, which is part of DOJ. [read post]
29 Jan 2014, 7:29 am by Lisa Kömives
Greenaway of the United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit wrote in the opinion that in Daubert v. [read post]
11 Feb 2015, 2:30 pm
The same Ms Swift has been working hard to secure trade mark protection in the United States for elements of her song lyrics, such as the vivid imagery of "this sick beat" and the rather more prosaic "we never go out of style". [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 4:46 am
Each year, doctors, pharmacists and other providers administer hundreds of millions of vaccines to children and adults in the United States. [read post]
19 Mar 2013, 7:42 am
On Friday, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit issued an opinion in Stewart v. [read post]
10 Jun 2018, 6:52 am by Jillian Blake
Currently 196 states are party to the Convention and the United States is the only U.N. state that is not party. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:45 am by Gideon
Twenty five years ago yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued one if its most shameful opinions in recent history: McCleskey v. [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the federal district court's dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, rejecting her arguments that:(1) the limitations on her access to school property were not reasonable because no reasonable person could have believed that she was attempting to evade the school’s security procedures or that she otherwise presented a risk of disruption; and (2) in the absence of such a justification and… [read post]
27 Oct 2020, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The United States Court of Appeal, Second Circuit, affirmed the federal district court's dismissal of Plaintiff's complaint, rejecting her arguments that:(1) the limitations on her access to school property were not reasonable because no reasonable person could have believed that she was attempting to evade the school’s security procedures or that she otherwise presented a risk of disruption; and (2) in the absence of such a justification and… [read post]
5 Nov 2018, 11:27 am
  Her defense attorney will be waging a strong fight to keep evidence from the jury that she writes the "How to Murder Your Husband" blog.Under a rule of evidence in effect throughout the United States, the judge will have to weigh the probative value of that evidence vs. the prejudicial effect of letting the jury hear it.The judge in the "People v. [read post]
1 Feb 2013, 10:09 am by Brian Shiffrin
United States, 447 U.S. 649, 656–657, 100 S.Ct. 2395, 2401–2402, 65 L.Ed.2d 410; United States v. [read post]