Search for: "United States v. Lively"
Results 6921 - 6940
of 11,397
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Apr 2023, 5:50 am
United States, where the Supreme Court construed a federal statute criminalizing possession of a firearm in the United States by “any person…who has been convicted in any court. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 4:55 am
After realizing that he lived in another unit, the cops headed downstairs where they found Wiggins trying to flee. [read post]
14 Apr 2024, 9:01 pm
It noted, quoting Justice Byron White’s concurring opinion in Furman v. [read post]
12 Nov 2019, 4:58 pm
” Kagan shot back, “Why wouldn’t the United States then say, you know, we live in a country in which courts play an important role in determining whether conduct is lawful. [read post]
29 May 2015, 4:20 am
” United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 6:30 am
Two weeks before the 1888 election, Republicans released a forged letter, allegedly from the British ambassador to the United States, stating that Cleveland was the preferred candidate of the British Empire, leading the Irish community in New York to abandon Cleveland’s campaign. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:56 pm
The most thoroughly developed of these proposes a legislative restructuring of copyright exhaustion in a flexible, multi-factor format, in part modeled on the United States’ fair use doctrine. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 5:19 am
United States, supra (quoting Jones v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 10:07 am
In his Order, after reviewing a number of relevant New York Appellate Division cases, United States Magistrate Judge William D. [read post]
31 Jan 2008, 8:36 pm
See United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2024, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court decided Dobbs v. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 11:30 am
That strategy helped secure the unanimous 1991 Supreme Court ruling in UAW v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 11:44 am
This decision is called Hedlund v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 8:06 am
Even for Justice Antonin Scalia, the crassest of the current United States Supreme Court justices, it was a particularly callous piece of writing. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:52 pm
In the first, United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2008, 9:50 pm
— are entitled to release under federal habeas law, and that they must be brought to the U.S. to live here at least temporarily. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:31 am
While this case was not decided by a court in the United States, it may set a trend. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 10:57 am
In 1984, United States v. [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 8:13 pm
— Nothing in this section shall be construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States. [read post]
15 May 2024, 1:07 pm
In particular, we have to distinguish specific questions of original meaning from more general—and, here, more relevant—questions of original law: that is, the law of the United States as it stood at the Founding, and as it's been lawfully changed to the present day. [read post]
