Search for: "Arizona Supreme Court" Results 6941 - 6960 of 9,060
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2011, 3:54 am by SHG
  Part of the deal that Arizona agreed to was to accept the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States as the final authority on what is, and what is not, constitutional. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 5:07 pm by Jared Sulzdorf
  Florida Federal Court Rules Health Reform Law Unconstitutional; Implementation Continues; Challenges Inevitably Headed for Supreme Court Resolution - Miami attorney Webb Millsaps on McDermott Will & Emery's blog Health Care Law Reform. [read post]
3 Feb 2011, 8:39 am by Steve Hall
Arizona used imported thiopental for the execution of Jeffrey Landrigan in October, with the approval of the Supreme Court, but under a flood of public criticism. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 7:03 pm by Jeff Gamso
  Oh, and that last part says that the legislature is to ensure that only the US Supreme Court can hear a challenge to a nullified law.Section 2, which is much longer, is an attempt to explain just what the Constitution means and how it is to be interpreted.What? [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 3:04 pm by Stephen Bilkis
And a challenge in the Supreme Court is likely to follow, notes a New York Criminal Lawyer. [read post]
2 Feb 2011, 10:32 am by Steve Hall
And: Kentucky again adopted its lethal injection protocol in May, six months after the Kentucky Supreme Court struck down the process after finding the state didn't properly put it in place. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 6:16 am
Arizona's politicians erroneously rely on early Supreme Court cases such as the Slaughterhouse Cases (1873) and Elk v. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:57 pm by John LeBlanc
It is widely anticipated that the ultimate resolution of the constitutionality of the PPACA will be made by the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 5:36 pm by Jared Sulzdorf
  Hard Times for Hard Drives: The Washington Supreme Court Addresses the Public Records Act in the Digital Age - Seattle lawyer Alicia Feichtmeir on Foster Pepper's Local Open Government Blog. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 2:59 pm by Amanda Frost
Arizona, though he notes that the practice is not unique either to that subject area or to the Roberts Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 8:30 am by azatty
The Delegation went to Arizona after Denver and met with Head of the Court of Appeals Judge Daniel Barker, and was in touch with Supreme Court and Federal Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:52 am by Russ Bensing
  The Ohio Supreme Court initially held that this was permissible in State v. [read post]
30 Jan 2011, 12:31 pm by Kaimipono D. Wenger
Attorney, District of Arizona (2007-09); Chief Counsel, U.S. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 11:53 pm by Jeff Gamso
It is a tried and true practice that the first thing a lawyer should do with a fiery pleading or letter is to file it under his or her pillow.That's Ohio Supreme Court Justice Paul Pfeifer, dissenting, from the decision of the Ohio Supreme Court to suspend Mark Gardner's license for a year (6 months probated) for mouthing off to a panel of appellate judges in a motion for reconsideration. [read post]
29 Jan 2011, 4:19 pm by Joseph C. McDaniel
This case is interesting in that sense, and is also interesting in that it marked the death of ride-through in Arizona, which is a part of the 9th Judicial Circuit. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:39 am by brian
In October, a majority of the Supreme Court wrongly insisted there was no evidence that the shortage had any bearing on whether an execution can be done constitutionally. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 11:03 am by Bill Raftery
Arizona SB 1185 Would change the state’s existing laws that allow the Supreme Court and Superior Courts (pursuant to rules adopted by the Supreme Court) to have e-filing to require they do (“may” to “shall”) Moreover, the bill would require the electronic access to court records and add bulk data to required material the courts shall provide. [read post]