Search for: "Billings v. United States" Results 6941 - 6960 of 10,160
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Dec 2011, 1:52 pm
Rivera-Martinez alleged that his employer did not pay him overtime wages, which is against the Oregon and United States law. [read post]
20 Mar 2022, 5:36 pm by INFORRM
On 14 March 2022, the Supreme Court denied Julian Assange permission to appeal against the High Court’s decision to extradite him to the United State as the application did not raise an arguable point of law. [read post]
25 Jan 2017, 6:37 pm by Paul M. Secunda
 Similarly, in the United States, a recent decision from the California Employment Development Department, found an Uber driver to be an employee for purposes of eligibility for unemployment law. [read post]
17 Mar 2019, 5:35 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill V-P, Sharp LJ and Sir Rupert Jackson). [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Democrats have proposed a new tough privacy bill which focuses on technology companies, the Guardian reports. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 2:07 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
PAUL, WEISS, RIFKIND, WHARTON & GARRISON, L.L.P., No 09 Civ. 5593 (RJS)UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK;2010 U.S. [read post]
15 May 2017, 8:04 am by Will Baude
The book I joined — “The Constitution of the United States,” by Michael Stokes Paulsen, Steven Calabresi, Michael McConnell and Samuel Bray — had already been through two editions. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm by INFORRM
United States Last week, President Biden established the White House Task Force to Address Online Harassment and Abuse, which appears will be focusing particularly on online harms which “disproportionately affect women, girls, people of colour and LGBTQI+ individuals” with “technology-facilitated gender-based violence” its top priority. [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:26 am by INFORRM
While the statements in question may have been made in the United States, they were republished in Ontario and were alleged to have caused injury to Lord Black’s reputation in Ontario. [read post]
3 Oct 2022, 12:12 pm by INFORRM
Ofcom states that if competition concerns are identified, it could lead to further action. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 4:12 pm by James Romoser
United States that Sheehan had a First Amendment right to continue publishing the classified material. [read post]