Search for: "Chief Justice of the United States" Results 6941 - 6960 of 14,933
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Jan 2012, 7:17 am by David Kravets
One of the Obama administration’s main arguments in support of warrantless GPS tracking was the high court’s 1983 decision in United States v. [read post]
12 Nov 2012, 5:20 am
This article examines the claim by Justice George Sutherland in United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 10:49 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts who took the extraordinary step of publicly calling out the president by saying this nation does not have “Obama judges or Trump judges, Bush judges or Clinton judges. [read post]
6 Jun 2016, 4:20 pm by Francesca Procaccini
An April 2016 report further revealed that in 60 samples of soil taken from Camp Justice and tested for benzo(a)pyrene—a highly carcinogenic material that is linked to scrotal cancer—78 percent of the samples were positive for the carcinogen. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Of the justices now on the Court, Samuel Alito seems the most likely to find merit in legal protection for animals, based on his solo dissent in the 2010 case of United States v. [read post]
4 Oct 2014, 4:48 pm
The defendant appeals to this court by permission of the Chief Judge. [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:39 am by John Elwood
But Chief Justice John Roberts (joined by Justice Stephen Breyer), Justice Samuel Alito, and Justice Brett Kavanaugh all wrote separate concurrences to either hold open the possibility, or to specifically endorse the idea, that the Fourth Amendment would permit warrantless entry of a home if there was a belief that medical assistance was needed or that people inside were in danger. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 8:01 am by Nabiha Syed
Briefly: At Dorf on Law, Mike Dorf focuses on another of last Thursday’s decisions:  United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2018, 6:38 am by Joy Waltemath
Many large corporations operating in the United States have boosted their profits by forcing employees to work off the clock, cheating them out of required overtime pay, and engaging in similar practices that together are known as “wage theft,” according to a new report, Grand Theft Paycheck: The Large Corporations Shortchanging Their Workers’ Wages, published by the Corporate Research Project of Good Jobs First and Jobs With Justice Education Fund. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
  In The New York Times, Adam Liptak suggests that, “[i] f judicial activism is defined as the tendency to strike down laws, the court led by Chief Justice John G. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 4:00 am by James Romoser
In another essay for the series, Amelia Burnette explores United States Forest Service v. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 3:16 am by Nicandro Iannacci
In a bid to strengthen Federalist power, he appointed Secretary of State John Marshall to be Chief Justice of the United States. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 9:19 am by Keith E. Whittington
James Madison thought it was “indispensable that some provision should be made for defending the Community against the incapacity, negligence or perfidy of the chief Magistrate. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 7:00 am by Ronald Collins and David Hudson
It is also manifest in the substance of his opinions, as evidenced by what he wrote in United States v. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:27 pm by Monica Williamson
In addition, the Minnesota United States Attorney’s Offices may also request that the Special Assistant United States Attorney assist in the prosecution of drug crime related cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2007, 2:27 pm
But the 80-year-old Gaylor marked a first Wednesday when a lawsuit she brought was heard by the United States Supreme Court....Two others from Wisconsin have high-profile roles in the litigation.Jay F. [read post]
24 Mar 2012, 4:41 pm by Susan F. Mandiberg
  Justice Breyer, who dissented in Apprendi, opposed the extension of that rule to the Federal Sentencing Guidelines in United States v. [read post]
13 May 2020, 3:46 am by Edith Roberts
” At Vox, Ian Millhiser observes that in a concurrence last week in United States v. [read post]