Search for: "DOES I-X" Results 6941 - 6960 of 7,403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Mar 2008, 1:59 pm by administrator
[i] The federal statute establishing the backup system for emergency responses is 42 USC § 5121 et seq. (2007). [read post]
23 Mar 2008, 8:56 pm
If you think that the Constitution does not prohibit X, then the call for judicial restraint also makes perfect sense because it's also an argument for enforcing the law properly. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 10:05 am
Once the deal is viewed as done, the Bear shareholders will continue to ride up or down depending on the markets' reactions generally, but tied to what JPM does. 2. [read post]
16 Mar 2008, 4:49 pm
But that feels a little too Hempel and Oppenhemim for taste (does that really mean nondeductiveness? [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:07 am
  Who says that these ladies even want to comment or have political opinions (well, of course, I’m sure Hillary does)? [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 9:22 am
SC06-688, SC06-912 "Article X, section 25 of the Florida Constitution, a ballot initiative passed by voters in 2004 and known as amendment 7, the Patients' Right to Know About Adverse Medical Incidents, is self-executing and retroactive and its provisions apply to records existing prior to its passage. [read post]
2 Mar 2008, 2:50 pm
X----------------------------------- What are the consequences if there are inconsistencies? [read post]